2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-phase dynamics during the two-droplet combustion of diesel-based fuel mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous conclusions, the maximum ignitable normalised spacing distance It is worth noting that when L/D 0 = 2.5 and P = 1 bar, the droplet interaction coefficient was larger than 1, indicating that the two-droplet burning rate was more rapid than that of the isolated droplet. The explanation for this observation is twofold: on the one hand the oxygen competition effect had less effect on the burning rate of the droplets at atmospheric pressure, and on the other hand, the area of the downstream sooty flame had increased in the two-droplet burning compared to the single-droplet case, thus increasing the heat transfer to the droplet surface due to radiation and convection, which in turn raised the burning rate of the droplets [19]. As the normalised spacing distance of the droplets was further increased, the droplets were wrapped in two separate flames at 1 bar, so the burning of the binary droplets became similar to that of a single droplet, and the droplet interaction coefficient approached one.…”
Section: Effects Of Puffing and Microexplosionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with previous conclusions, the maximum ignitable normalised spacing distance It is worth noting that when L/D 0 = 2.5 and P = 1 bar, the droplet interaction coefficient was larger than 1, indicating that the two-droplet burning rate was more rapid than that of the isolated droplet. The explanation for this observation is twofold: on the one hand the oxygen competition effect had less effect on the burning rate of the droplets at atmospheric pressure, and on the other hand, the area of the downstream sooty flame had increased in the two-droplet burning compared to the single-droplet case, thus increasing the heat transfer to the droplet surface due to radiation and convection, which in turn raised the burning rate of the droplets [19]. As the normalised spacing distance of the droplets was further increased, the droplets were wrapped in two separate flames at 1 bar, so the burning of the binary droplets became similar to that of a single droplet, and the droplet interaction coefficient approached one.…”
Section: Effects Of Puffing and Microexplosionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Xiong et al [18] claimed that interactions between droplets slowed down the droplet heating time early in the burning life due to the oxygen competition, leading to a reduction in burning rate. Faik et al [19] studied the combustion characteristics of two diesel-based fuel droplets and found that the burning rate of interactive droplets was higher than that of an isolated droplet, owing to the increased heat transfer rate from the sooty flame. Yoschida et al [20] conducted experiments with droplets placed at SiC fibre intersections under microgravity in order to study the flame spread limit for interactive burning droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pembakaran droplet tunggal akan merepresentasikan droplet yang terbentuk pada pembakaran spray. Pada beberapa penelitian terdahulu, uji pembakaran droplet banyak dilakukan pada minyak nabati dan biodiesel yang terdiri atas senyawa multikomponen [18][19][20][21][22]. Pada penelitian tersebut, fenomena-fenomena yang diamati selama pembakaran droplet dikaitkan dengan konsentrasi senyawa yang paling dominan dalam bahan bakar.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The thermal atomization mechanism of droplet disintegration is based on the difference between the thermophysical properties of droplet components. This type of atomization can manifest itself when heating inhomogeneous droplets by puffing [30][31][32] or microexplosion [33][34][35][36][37]. Additionally, there are known technologies for the artificial carbonation of liquid fuels in order to use gas bubbles (for example, CO 2 ) as micro-explosion centers [38].…”
Section: Clf Atomization In the Combustion Chambers Of Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%