1983
DOI: 10.1070/pu1983v026n05abeh004407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-metal ion emitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumed equality of the superconducting gaps nd and d on the nd and d FS sections, respectively, is a consequence of the strong mixing of the electron spectrum branches by the matrix elements of the effective four-fermion interaction Hamiltonian, the interaction being a generalization of the virtual-boson-induced BCS-like contact attraction for an anisotropic system. In the framework of the Bilbro-McMillan model [25] adopted by us there is a possibility to consider two separate equations for nd and d [15]. Thus, one is forced to solve self-consistently a system of three equations for (T ), nd (T ) and d (T ).…”
Section: Theory and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The assumed equality of the superconducting gaps nd and d on the nd and d FS sections, respectively, is a consequence of the strong mixing of the electron spectrum branches by the matrix elements of the effective four-fermion interaction Hamiltonian, the interaction being a generalization of the virtual-boson-induced BCS-like contact attraction for an anisotropic system. In the framework of the Bilbro-McMillan model [25] adopted by us there is a possibility to consider two separate equations for nd and d [15]. Thus, one is forced to solve self-consistently a system of three equations for (T ), nd (T ) and d (T ).…”
Section: Theory and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That result, as is demonstrated below, remains correct in a more accurate approach. Nevertheless, our previous considerations [14][15][16] had a significant limitation. Specifically, the treatment of the superconducting phase with CDWs was not self-consistent, which made quite unexpectedly the whole problem more rather than less involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our model however fails for x < 0.063, because a finite magnetic order parameter is not taken into account in our model. The counterintuitive sharp increase of T c with increasing scattering rate in the underdoped samples was actually predicted theoretically in Refs 123,124. Theoretically, this rise is expected in any density-wave superconductor, for both s ++ and s± states, [124][125][126] and is due to a stronger sensitivity of SDW or CDW to disorder than superconductivity. This is the reason why T c increases with Γ, and this is potentially a direction for future studies.…”
Section: Pair Breaking and S± Superconductivity Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holmes [3] assumed that the stripped electrons were thermalised with the plasma electrons and that this was the source of the electron energy. It has been shown that this is never the case for the HNB and does not occur within the first 0.75 m of the DNB, so at this point the Holmes model has been modified to use the average creation energy of the electrons as the energy source term U e and this quantity is evaluated in the section below.…”
Section: The Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%