2022
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-Liver Phantom

Abstract: Objectives: Tissue stiffness can guide medical diagnoses and is exploited as an imaging contrast in elastography. However, different elastography devices show different liver stiffness values in the same subject, hindering comparison of values and establishment of system-independent thresholds for disease detection. There is a need for standardized phantoms that specifically address the viscosity-related dispersion of stiffness over frequency. To improve standardization of clinical elastography across devices … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we classified livers according to their mechanical properties. The clustering in two groups based on the cutoff value of 1.6 m/s for the liver SWS agrees with SWS values of a healthy human liver, i.e., approximately 1.4 m/s for 30-60 Hz when considering the dispersion of SWS in the liver as analyzed by Morr et al (2022). This biomechanical classification revealed that stiff livers differ significantly from soft livers in their metabolic capacities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, we classified livers according to their mechanical properties. The clustering in two groups based on the cutoff value of 1.6 m/s for the liver SWS agrees with SWS values of a healthy human liver, i.e., approximately 1.4 m/s for 30-60 Hz when considering the dispersion of SWS in the liver as analyzed by Morr et al (2022). This biomechanical classification revealed that stiff livers differ significantly from soft livers in their metabolic capacities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The setup we used in this study was less biased than other inversion-based MRE techniques (46) due to the cylinder geometry of the samples and the noiseinsensitive, analytical solution for elasticity reconstruction. The consistency of our method was confirmed in a wellcharacterized tissue-mimicking phantom providing values in agreement with shear oscillatory rheometry (47). Due to this consistency, tabletop MRE was used in previous studies (41,(48)(49)(50) as a reference method and was employed here without further calibration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Possible underlying mechanisms relate to effective-medium stiffness properties, which are altered by vascular softening ( Parker, 2014 ; Parker, 2015 ) or poroelastic effects such as increased coupling between blood pool and solid tissue ( Lilaj et al, 2021 ). Poroelastic effects in elastography are known to be more relevant in the lower frequency range ( McGarry et al, 2015 ), which might have contributed to the aforementioned discrepancies of results reported in the literature since transient elastography techniques exploit higher frequency bands than THE ( Morr et al, 2022 ). Of note, the baseline stiffness values we measured in our experiment (liver: 1.36 m/s, spleen: 1.63 m/s) are slightly lower than what has been reported in previous studies using THE (Tzschätzsch et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%