2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid–liquid slug flow separation in a slit shaped micro device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact angle was found to influence not only the bubble length and formation, but flow pattern itself as it was shown also in [20,21]. Wetting properties of the liquids can be used to design slug flow separator of the liquids [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The contact angle was found to influence not only the bubble length and formation, but flow pattern itself as it was shown also in [20,21]. Wetting properties of the liquids can be used to design slug flow separator of the liquids [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Effective liquid-liquid slug flow separation was achieved with PTFE membrane or microdevice that selectively lets the organic phase pass through [41,54,111,112]. Also, it was achieved with wettability-based separation units with branched hydrophobic and hydrophilic outlets [55,62,105]. So far, slug flow has only been realized on a laboratory scale.…”
Section: Slug Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some of these applications phase separation was also achieved in flow. Some studies were focused on the development of phase separation units for separating the aqueous and organic phases of the slug flow [41,62,111,112]. Effective liquid-liquid slug flow separation was achieved with PTFE membrane or microdevice that selectively lets the organic phase pass through [41,54,111,112].…”
Section: Slug Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they concluded that the extrapolation of the model is difficult for different LL systems, as the phase splitting is influenced by a number of geometrical and rheological parameters. Gaakeer et al [73] provided a slit-shaped microdevice for LL slug flow phase separation. They revealed that separation efficiencies of 99.5% can be achieved for the volumetric flow rates of 30-50 mL/min and the separator provides a small residence time.…”
Section: Two-phase Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%