The prediction of the interfacial area formed when one liquid is injected into a second immiscible liquid through a single orifice or nozzle is necessary for calculations of heat and mass transfer rates in such processes. This paper considers the low flow velocity region prior to jet formation where uniform size drops are formed directly at the nozzle tip and break off in a regular pattern. Hayworth and Treybal ( 5 ) and Null and Johnson (8) both present photographs which illustrate the drop formation process.Harkins and Brown ( 4 ) derived an expression for calculating the drop volume at negligibly small flow rates by equating the buoyancy and interfacial tension forces and correctin the volume for the fraction of liquid which Although Rao et al. indicate that their analysis significantly reduces the error for many systems ( l o ) , it has some weaknesses, the most evident of which is its inability to predict a drop volume smaller than that given by the Harkins and Brown analysis. Drops of smaller than static condition size were observed in this study.This paper presents an improved correlation for drop volume based on the two-stage drop formation process and extensive experimental data.
EXPERIMENTAL STUDYAlthough several sets of drop volume data exist in the literature ( 5 , 8, IO), it was felt that additional experiments were necessary to obtain a better understanding of the mechanism of drop formation and to provide a more stringent test of any proposed correlation by extending the range of variables studied. Experiments were designed to obtain drop diameter as a function of injection velocity and nozzle diameter for systems with a wide range of physical properties. In all systems the dispersed phase was of lower density than the continuous phase.The experimental apparatus is shown schematically in Figure 1. The test section consisted of a continuous phase tank, into whose bottom the desired nozzle was fastened. The tank.