2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid–liquid displacement porometry to estimate the molecular weight cut-off of ultrafiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a representation the biggest pore corresponds to the first one opened while the smallest one should be opened when the 100% of the flux has been reached. A graphical determination of the pore size such that 90 % of the pores are smaller, and only 10 % of the total pores are bigger, should define what we will use to estimate the molecular weight cut-off for the membrane, [26]. In this estimation, a semiempirical correlation between molecular weight, diffusion coefficient and molecule Stoke´s radius, valid for dextran molecules, [32], will be used.…”
Section: Cut-off Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In such a representation the biggest pore corresponds to the first one opened while the smallest one should be opened when the 100% of the flux has been reached. A graphical determination of the pore size such that 90 % of the pores are smaller, and only 10 % of the total pores are bigger, should define what we will use to estimate the molecular weight cut-off for the membrane, [26]. In this estimation, a semiempirical correlation between molecular weight, diffusion coefficient and molecule Stoke´s radius, valid for dextran molecules, [32], will be used.…”
Section: Cut-off Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary Liquid-Liquid Displacement Porosimetry (LLDP), because it uses a pair of immiscible liquids with very low interfacial tension is very suitable for characterizing UF membranes at relatively low applied pressures. Tung In this work, porosity and pore size distribution of two different kinds of commercial polymeric UF membranes evaluated by LLDP will be used to estimate their MWCO according to a procedure previously developed, [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, using the calculation procedure described by Calvo et al [9], the molecular weight cut off was estimated. This method is based on finding the pore size that constitutes 90% of the total population of pores in the membrane.…”
Section: Lldpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By raising the pressure stepwise, corresponding pore radius and flow values are revealed and the total permeability of the membrane can be acquired. Moreover, molecular weight cut off was estimated from LLDP data using a procedure previously published [9].…”
Section: Liquid-liquid Displacement Porometrymentioning
confidence: 99%