2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Jet Ejector Efficiency Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zaheer and Masud (2017), the LES approach provided more detailed information about flow instabilities inside the ejector, along with the cost of the computational time. Ismagilov et al (2017) investigated nozzle reduction using a blade agitator on the liquid jet ejector efficiency to define the optimum nozzle throat area. Haida et al (2016b) numerically analysed R744 liquid ejectors installed in a prototype multi-ejector module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zaheer and Masud (2017), the LES approach provided more detailed information about flow instabilities inside the ejector, along with the cost of the computational time. Ismagilov et al (2017) investigated nozzle reduction using a blade agitator on the liquid jet ejector efficiency to define the optimum nozzle throat area. Haida et al (2016b) numerically analysed R744 liquid ejectors installed in a prototype multi-ejector module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%