2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid hydrogen, methylcyclohexane, and ammonia as potential hydrogen storage: Comparison review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficient storage of hydrogen is the key technical problem that needs to be overcome. Various approaches, such as high‐pressure hydrogen gas cylinder, liquid hydrogen tank, cryo‐physisorption of hydrogen in large surface area materials, and chemisorption of hydrogen over hydrides, have been explored for onboard hydrogen storage over the years. Storing H 2 in its elemental form is straightforward and has fast charge/discharge rates, however, suffers from low volumetric energy density and excessive energy losses during H 2 compression, liquefaction, and boil‐off .…”
Section: Hydrogen Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficient storage of hydrogen is the key technical problem that needs to be overcome. Various approaches, such as high‐pressure hydrogen gas cylinder, liquid hydrogen tank, cryo‐physisorption of hydrogen in large surface area materials, and chemisorption of hydrogen over hydrides, have been explored for onboard hydrogen storage over the years. Storing H 2 in its elemental form is straightforward and has fast charge/discharge rates, however, suffers from low volumetric energy density and excessive energy losses during H 2 compression, liquefaction, and boil‐off .…”
Section: Hydrogen Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various H 2 storage techniques, three potential candidates, i.e., LOHC (MCH-toluene system), NH 3, and Liquid H 2 have been compared. The comparison has been presented in Table 3 [7]. The gravimetric density of liquid H 2 is highest, followed by NH 3 and LOHC.…”
Section: Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regeneration temperatures required for the NH 3 system are in the range of 400-500 • C, compared with 100-200 • C for the LOHC system. Therefore, LOHC has been termed as an efficient technique, as it is comparatively the most established and efficient technique [7].…”
Section: Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations