2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2939648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Crystal Based Dielectric Waveguide Phase Shifters for Phased Arrays at W-Band

Abstract: In this work, the feasibility of microwave liquid crystal based dielectric waveguide phased shifters is investigated in a phased rod antenna array for the first time. For this, a 1 × 4 rod antenna array is designed including the phase shifters as well as a cascaded E-plane power divider network. As core elements, the phase shifter are designed as continuously tunable subwavelength fibers, partially filled with a newly specifically synthesized microwave liquid crystal, exhibiting a maximum FoM 145 • /dB at 102.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of this demonstrator revealed a differential phase shift of 387 • at 25 GHz, with an insertion loss ranging from 3.5 dB to 5.5 dB depending on the tuning state. Here, the maximum FoM achieved is 70 • /dB (see (1)), which is comparable to other similar phase shifter topologies like ridged hollow waveguide [16] or inverted Microstrip lines [17], but cannot compete with hollow waveguide [8] or sub wavelength fiber [18] topology. A more comprehensive comparison with other LC based phase shifters is given in Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The measurement of this demonstrator revealed a differential phase shift of 387 • at 25 GHz, with an insertion loss ranging from 3.5 dB to 5.5 dB depending on the tuning state. Here, the maximum FoM achieved is 70 • /dB (see (1)), which is comparable to other similar phase shifter topologies like ridged hollow waveguide [16] or inverted Microstrip lines [17], but cannot compete with hollow waveguide [8] or sub wavelength fiber [18] topology. A more comprehensive comparison with other LC based phase shifters is given in Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Finally, a comparison between the proposed phase shifter and other reconfigurable phase shifters in mm-wave frequencies is illustrated in Table I. The proposed reconfigurable phase shifter achieves a better performance in insertion losses and FoM (figure-of-merit) along the operating frequency [13]. The return losses (RL) achieved by our phase shifter has good performance compared with the referenced works except for [26].…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some of the reported tunable phase shifters require a complex setup [5] or a more complicated implementation of the tuning elements in the waveguide [15]. By applying the gap waveguide to the phase shifter design, more options in the location of the gap for the split waveguide is achieved in contrast with the traditional implementation using E-plane split waveguide [13]. In addition, compared with the commercial devices [27], [28], the gap-waveguide phase shifter presents a reduced volume and low cost that allow a cost-effective and easy integration in a full system.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the power losses and radiation efficiency, a better alternative is the use of waveguide antenna arrays. In the recent years some advances have been made in the integration of tunable electronic components with waveguide devices [12]- [15], although there is still margin for improvement. On the other hand, while presenting a longer reconfiguration time than the electronic alternatives, mechanical reconfiguration techniques are specially adequate to achieve high performance and low power losses [16]- [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%