2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the simultaneous quantitation of artemether and lumefantrine in human plasma: Application for a pharmacokinetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed method uses 20 l of mouse WB or plasma which is the smallest sample volume as compared to other published methods [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The protein precipitation extraction method was robust, efficient and provided high recovery rates for LF in both WB and plasma.…”
Section: Intra-assay (N = 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The developed method uses 20 l of mouse WB or plasma which is the smallest sample volume as compared to other published methods [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The protein precipitation extraction method was robust, efficient and provided high recovery rates for LF in both WB and plasma.…”
Section: Intra-assay (N = 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean percentage recovery for LF in plasma, evaluated at high, medium and low concentrations, were 114.2% (%CV = 0.6), 109.8% (%CV = 2.7) and 100.5% (%CV = 8.7), respectively. Cesar et al [13] used a protein precipitation extraction method and reported recovery values for LF ranging from 81.4 to 83.2%. Munjal et al [12] also used a protein precipitation extraction method and reported a mean LF recovery of 58.8%.…”
Section: Intra-assay (N = 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some other recent methods for the assay of these drugs alone or in combination with other antimalarials have also been reported [24][25][26][27][28]. However, these methods still had some limitations related to the chromatography and detection in terms of resolution, time-consuming, and requiring prolonged derivatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts on application of LC–MS method for determination of LF in human plasma failed due to matrix effect (ME) [11]. Recently, several LC–MS/MS methods were reported, but the issue of ME has not been addressed sufficiently [1215]. Using protein precipitation for sample preparation, Hodel et al reported the first LC–MS/MS method for LF, but the ME was significant: 22.7–29.1% (100% = no ME) [12], while César et al claimed the ME in their method was within the 85 to 115% range, but the calibration curve required a weighted quadratic regression [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%