2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.09.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric confirmatory method for determining aflatoxin M1 in cow milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
65
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, Cavaliere et al demonstrated that the QTrap technology opens a new dimension of MS analyte confirmation and quantification. Its operation in the quadrupole linear ion trap configuration (enhanced product ion scans) produces complete product ions mass spectra even close to the LOQ which guarantees accurate analyte quantification simultaneously to unambiguous analyte confirmation (Cavaliere et al, 2006). Cavaliere et al compared the calibration curves set up in standard solution and in sample matrix and found close similarity of both slopes, proving that the influence of matrix components on the analyte signal was negligible and matrix effects could be excluded.…”
Section: Hplc-ms-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, Cavaliere et al demonstrated that the QTrap technology opens a new dimension of MS analyte confirmation and quantification. Its operation in the quadrupole linear ion trap configuration (enhanced product ion scans) produces complete product ions mass spectra even close to the LOQ which guarantees accurate analyte quantification simultaneously to unambiguous analyte confirmation (Cavaliere et al, 2006). Cavaliere et al compared the calibration curves set up in standard solution and in sample matrix and found close similarity of both slopes, proving that the influence of matrix components on the analyte signal was negligible and matrix effects could be excluded.…”
Section: Hplc-ms-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attributed this observation to severe matrix effects that are not compensated by the applied internal standard AFM1 and by a calibration curve set up in standard solution (Vahl & Jrgensen, 1998). Besides, Blesa et al demonstrated in peanut samples that LC/MS is less sensitive than LC-FL (Blesa et al, 2003) though this can be partly explained by the use of single quadrupole instrumentation in the SIM mode that is inferior to a tandem MS and SRM recording (Cavaliere et al, 2006;Vahl et al, 1998).…”
Section: Hplc-ms-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations