2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2787(200007)19:4<165::aid-mas1>3.3.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry in forensic toxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some overlaps between transitions of the analytes are observed (see Table 1) between BZE and NCO and have already been described by Van Bocxlaer et al in 2000 [22]. However, in contrast to their work, the chromatographic system described here separates the analytes and eliminates the problem.…”
Section: Specificitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Some overlaps between transitions of the analytes are observed (see Table 1) between BZE and NCO and have already been described by Van Bocxlaer et al in 2000 [22]. However, in contrast to their work, the chromatographic system described here separates the analytes and eliminates the problem.…”
Section: Specificitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…OH-PBDEs were the compounds with high polarity and high molecular mass. ESI has the potential to ionize a wide variety of analytes including compounds with high polarity and/or high molecular mass; while APCI is limited to moderate polarity and moderate molecular mass compounds [21]. Previous research has found that ES operated in negative mode (ES-) can produce a higher signal for the OH-PBDEs than APCI [17].…”
Section: Optimization Of Ms Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine drug testing is the most widely used for monitoring drug abuse in workplaces and undergoes to strict regulations [18]. The analysis of drugs of abuse in biological samples has been reviewed by various authors [19][20][21][22]: gas chromatography (GC) and specially GC coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) are the most widely used technique for confirmatory of positive screening tests because they provide high level of selectivity and sensitivity [9,[23][24][25][26]; liquid chromatography (LC)-MS is more versatile, does not require derivatization of target compounds and sample pretreatment is usually simpler [27,28]; more recently LC-MS and LC-MS 2 are becoming more commonly used than GC-MS and GC-MS 2 in this field [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%