1997
DOI: 10.2307/1551995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Assets for Fat Bankers: Summer Nectarivory by Migratory Moths in the Rocky Mountains, Colorado, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the army cutworm moth, which has similar seasonal migratory patterns to the bogong moth, forms dense aggregations during summer and is a major food for some populations of grizzly bears in the Rocky Mountains (Chapman et al 1955;Robison et al 2006). Unlike bogong moths that do not feed once in the aestivation sites (Common 1954), army cutworm moths continue to feed and in fact accumulate fat while present in alpine areas (Kevan & Kendall 1997). Army cutworm moths spend about 2 months aggregating in alpine areas of Glacier National Park where they are preyed on by grizzly bears (White et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the army cutworm moth, which has similar seasonal migratory patterns to the bogong moth, forms dense aggregations during summer and is a major food for some populations of grizzly bears in the Rocky Mountains (Chapman et al 1955;Robison et al 2006). Unlike bogong moths that do not feed once in the aestivation sites (Common 1954), army cutworm moths continue to feed and in fact accumulate fat while present in alpine areas (Kevan & Kendall 1997). Army cutworm moths spend about 2 months aggregating in alpine areas of Glacier National Park where they are preyed on by grizzly bears (White et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem extending over 16 000 km 2 the number of red foxes preying on army cutworm moths would probably add substantially to the energy flow into the system harvested by grizzly bears. No energy budget has been calculated for army cutworm moths, but unlike bogong moths they leave the mountains with 50-60% more fat than when they arrived (Kevan & Kendall 1997;White et al 1998) and hence the direction of energy flow would be the difference between the loss of energy to grizzly bears (and other predators) and the amount of flux to the plains. A total take by predators and a calculated energy and nutrient flux for this system would be of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…host plant quality/availability, population density) factors (Johnson, 1969;Kieckhefer et al, 1974;Kevan & Kendall, 1997;Capinera, 2001). temperature, photoperiod, rainfall) and biotic (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature, photoperiod, rainfall) and biotic (e.g. host plant quality/availability, population density) factors (Johnson, 1969;Kieckhefer et al, 1974;Kevan & Kendall, 1997;Capinera, 2001). However, very little is known about the origin of immigrants, which is of importance not only when developing pest management strategies but also for studying the potential impact of climate change on seasonal migratory patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its broad dispersal to temperate and high-elevation sites may reflect migratory flights to cooler environments, as is known for a number of other noctuoids (Kevan and Kendall 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%