2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid argon calorimeter performance at high rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the LAr gaps for the improved detector were therefore chosen to be roughly 100 µm, 200 µm and 300 µm for sFCal1, 2 and 3, respectively -reductions by factors of 2.7, 1.9 and 1.7 relative to those of the original FCal. Irradiation tests carried out at IHEP/Protvino confirmed that at beam intensities of up to 10 10 protons/s, the peak height of the ionization signal current for the case of the standarddesign FCal will suffer, whereas in the case of a prototype constructed with the same basic design but with LAr gaps approximately 44% the original size (a reduction from 269 µm to 119 µm), the peak height was shown to be stable even up to the highest beam intensities recorded in the test setup [8]. The high-voltage sagging effects would be countered by employing protection resistors in the sFCal a factor of ten smaller than the 1-2 MΩ resistors used in the FCal.…”
Section: B Proposed Finer-granularity Fcal Replacementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The values of the LAr gaps for the improved detector were therefore chosen to be roughly 100 µm, 200 µm and 300 µm for sFCal1, 2 and 3, respectively -reductions by factors of 2.7, 1.9 and 1.7 relative to those of the original FCal. Irradiation tests carried out at IHEP/Protvino confirmed that at beam intensities of up to 10 10 protons/s, the peak height of the ionization signal current for the case of the standarddesign FCal will suffer, whereas in the case of a prototype constructed with the same basic design but with LAr gaps approximately 44% the original size (a reduction from 269 µm to 119 µm), the peak height was shown to be stable even up to the highest beam intensities recorded in the test setup [8]. The high-voltage sagging effects would be countered by employing protection resistors in the sFCal a factor of ten smaller than the 1-2 MΩ resistors used in the FCal.…”
Section: B Proposed Finer-granularity Fcal Replacementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most affected is the forward region of the detector where HEC, EMEC and FCal are located. The limitations in operation, signal reconstruction and radiation hardness of the end-cap and forward calorimeters at very high intensities have been studied in the Hilum [6] R&D project. Small modules of the EMEC, HEC and FCal calorimeters were built, placed in separate cryostats and exposed to high intensity proton beams of 50 GeV at IHEP (Protvino, Russia).…”
Section: Expected Radiation Doses and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small prototype of the first layer of the planned FCal replacement, with smaller LAr gaps, was tested [11] and on figure 13 the stability of the signal is shown as a function of proton beam intensity, up to values exceeding those expected at the HL-LHC. The other option would be a small calorimeter in front of the high−η part of the existing FCal, in order to absorb some of the energy in this region of very high particle flux.…”
Section: Phase-2 Upgradesmentioning
confidence: 99%