1973
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.8.368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-Aluminum Structure Factor by Neutron Diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10). 64,65 We close the present discussion of the RMS ratio by pointing out that it is used in the literature not only as an indicator for crystallization. Wendt and Abraham have argued that R RMS = 0.14 signals the transition into a supercooled liquid or amorphous state.…”
Section: Microstructure At Freezing and Related Lengths 1 Static supporting
confidence: 72%
“…10). 64,65 We close the present discussion of the RMS ratio by pointing out that it is used in the literature not only as an indicator for crystallization. Wendt and Abraham have argued that R RMS = 0.14 signals the transition into a supercooled liquid or amorphous state.…”
Section: Microstructure At Freezing and Related Lengths 1 Static supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, we take special care for testing the MD code calculating the DSF of the lattice. Liquid aluminum was chosen for this purpose, because there is a wide set of measurements of the structure factor of this system [30][31][32].…”
Section: Verification Of the MD Model Of Dsf Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This range encompasses the first peak and part of the second in the structure factor. [24] Consequently, for € ω > ω p ion-ion correlations should not significantly affect the photon absorption. Conversely, for € ω ≤ ω p the ion-ion correlations would impact the results.…”
Section: Ion-ion Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%