2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquefaction mitigation mechanisms of stone column-improved ground by dynamic centrifuge model tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ratio is defined as the relationship between the stress acting on the top of column (c) and the stress acting on the adjacent soil (s), as shown in Eq. (1). In previous field measurements and laboratory findings, the value of nc for granular columns was found to vary from 2 to 6 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ratio is defined as the relationship between the stress acting on the top of column (c) and the stress acting on the adjacent soil (s), as shown in Eq. (1). In previous field measurements and laboratory findings, the value of nc for granular columns was found to vary from 2 to 6 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The compaction and drainage acceleration actions promote the expansion of the neighboring soil, impeding the buildup of excessive pore water pressure during seismic shaking. Consequently, this substantially decreases the likelihood of liquefaction and subsequent settlement after the shaking event [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%