2006
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/5/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipschitz stability for a stationary 2D inverse problem with unknown polygonal boundary

Abstract: We consider the stability issue for the inverse problem of determining an unknown portion Σ of a two-dimensional simply connected domain from overdetermined boundary data for the Laplace equation. In this paper, we study the case in which Σ is a polygonal line. We prove a Lipschitz stability estimate under further a priori geometric assumptions on Σ.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we prove the main result that consists of showing the uniform continuity for DF and F −1 , and establishing a lower bound for DF . These results together with the Fréchet differentiability of F establish Theorem 2.3 by Proposition 5 of [6]. 4.1.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In this section we prove the main result that consists of showing the uniform continuity for DF and F −1 , and establishing a lower bound for DF . These results together with the Fréchet differentiability of F establish Theorem 2.3 by Proposition 5 of [6]. 4.1.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, asymptotically, which in practice means paying the price of ensuring a very small error on the measurement, the exponential ill-posedness of the problem may be kept under control. This is in accord with several results in which the illposedness of an inverse boundary value problem is tamed if the unknown features to be recovered can be described in a discrete way, see for example [2,4,5]. With respect to the unknown discrete boundaries considered in [2,5], the main novelty here is the fact that we deal with a three-dimensional, instead of two-dimensional, problem and that the number of pieces forming the unknown boundary, namely the number of cells, is not fixed and is not a priori known.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, such a result has been proved only for scatterers of a special type. Following previous results by Liu and Nachman, [16], and Cheng and Yamamoto, [7,8], it has been proved in [3] that any polyhedral scatterer is determined in a unique way by a single far-field measurement. By a polyhedral scatterer we mean a scatterer whose boundary is the union of a finite number of cells, each cell being the closure of a domain contained in a hypersurface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The numerical solution represents reasonable approximation and it is stable with respect to a small amount of noise as shown in figures 6,9. Figures 4,5,7,8,10,11, shown the decrease of cost function J and the L ∞ -norm of DJ(γ) in the course of the optimization process. 7.1.2.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%