Abstract:Aims: Prediabetes and diabetes are associated with increased insulin resistance and decreased insulin production, dyslipidemia, and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Our goals were to assess lipoprotein subfractions using novel assays in such subjects.Methods: Fasting normal, prediabetic, and diabetic Taiwanese men and women (n = 2,049) had their serum glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), HDL3-C, apolipop… Show more
“…Therefore, it is apparent that the measurement of LDLC quantifies the cholesterol content of LDL particles but does not take into account the vast heterogeneity of LDL particles among individuals, and the use of LDLC to evaluate cholesterol-related cardiovascular risk may actually underestimate future risk in individuals who have a high level of circulating sdLDLC. Except for the atherogenic role of sdLDLC, it was also found that sdLDLC levels were strongly associated with atherosclerotic risk markers such as inflammation, thrombosis, hematologic markers 26 ) , and prediabetes 27 ) , which was further demonstrated in our study where sdLDLC levels were significantly correlated with hs-CRP and fasting blood glucose in the general population. Taking all these findings into account, the measurement of sdLDLC may therefore help clinicians to reclassify individuals thought to be at low risk into the high-risk category, for early intervention.…”
A high-risk strategy has been implemented for lipid-lowering therapy in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events are common among individuals with low cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to determine whether the small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDLC) level can predict carotid atherosclerosis progression and identify high-risk individuals. Methods: Baseline sdLDLC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) were measured in 808 particip ants from the Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study, aged 45 74 years. Adjusted relative risk was calculated using a modified Poisson regression model to assess the relationship between sdLDLC and 5-year atherosclerosis progression, as indicated by the progression, incidence, and multi-territorial extent of carotid plaque. Results: The 5-year atherosclerosis progression increased significantly with increased sdLDLC. Baseline sdLDLC was significantly associated with the short-term risk of plaque progression after multivariable adjustment, even in participants with low LDLC or a 10-year estimated cardiovascular risk. sdLDLC predicted plaque progression (relative risk 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.43 2.93) in participants with LDLC 130 mg/dL. Furthermore, participants with the highest sdLDLC but intermediate or low cardiovascular risk (accounting for 16% of the cohort) had double the risk of plaque progression, which was comparable to those with the same sdLDLC and high cardiovascular risk, relative to those with the lowest sdLDLC levels and low cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: sdLDLC is independently associated with the progression of carotid atherosclerosis, which may provide a basis for clinicians to reclassify individuals believed to be at low cardiovascular risk into the high-risk category, and those with high sdLDLC may benefit from more aggressive cholesterol-lowering treatment. through the appropriate management of modifiable risk factors. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) is considered as one of the most important modifiable risk factors for CVD and remains the primary target for current cardiovascular risk reduction
“…Therefore, it is apparent that the measurement of LDLC quantifies the cholesterol content of LDL particles but does not take into account the vast heterogeneity of LDL particles among individuals, and the use of LDLC to evaluate cholesterol-related cardiovascular risk may actually underestimate future risk in individuals who have a high level of circulating sdLDLC. Except for the atherogenic role of sdLDLC, it was also found that sdLDLC levels were strongly associated with atherosclerotic risk markers such as inflammation, thrombosis, hematologic markers 26 ) , and prediabetes 27 ) , which was further demonstrated in our study where sdLDLC levels were significantly correlated with hs-CRP and fasting blood glucose in the general population. Taking all these findings into account, the measurement of sdLDLC may therefore help clinicians to reclassify individuals thought to be at low risk into the high-risk category, for early intervention.…”
A high-risk strategy has been implemented for lipid-lowering therapy in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events are common among individuals with low cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to determine whether the small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDLC) level can predict carotid atherosclerosis progression and identify high-risk individuals. Methods: Baseline sdLDLC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) were measured in 808 particip ants from the Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study, aged 45 74 years. Adjusted relative risk was calculated using a modified Poisson regression model to assess the relationship between sdLDLC and 5-year atherosclerosis progression, as indicated by the progression, incidence, and multi-territorial extent of carotid plaque. Results: The 5-year atherosclerosis progression increased significantly with increased sdLDLC. Baseline sdLDLC was significantly associated with the short-term risk of plaque progression after multivariable adjustment, even in participants with low LDLC or a 10-year estimated cardiovascular risk. sdLDLC predicted plaque progression (relative risk 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.43 2.93) in participants with LDLC 130 mg/dL. Furthermore, participants with the highest sdLDLC but intermediate or low cardiovascular risk (accounting for 16% of the cohort) had double the risk of plaque progression, which was comparable to those with the same sdLDLC and high cardiovascular risk, relative to those with the lowest sdLDLC levels and low cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: sdLDLC is independently associated with the progression of carotid atherosclerosis, which may provide a basis for clinicians to reclassify individuals believed to be at low cardiovascular risk into the high-risk category, and those with high sdLDLC may benefit from more aggressive cholesterol-lowering treatment. through the appropriate management of modifiable risk factors. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) is considered as one of the most important modifiable risk factors for CVD and remains the primary target for current cardiovascular risk reduction
“…However, routine lipid measures may not well reflect the compositional changes of lipid parameters in DM and Pre-DM patients. For example, no significant increase in LDL-C levels was found in some DM and Pre-DM patients [16]. In patients with metabolic disorder, the increase in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles could initiate a sequence of hydrolysis process and result in higher plasma sdLDL levels [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hyperglycemic status, the HL-mediated pathway is more active [6]. Thus, the plasma level of sdLDL is significantly elevated in pre-diabetes (Pre-DM) and DM individuals [13,16]. Furthermore, sdLDL is more susceptible to glycation than lbLDL, which may increase its atherogenicity [17].…”
Background: Elevation in small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) is common in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), which has already been reported to be associated with incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of plasma sdLDL level in patients with stable CAD and DM. Methods: A total of 4148 consecutive patients with stable CAD were prospectively enrolled into the study and followed up for major cardiovascular events (MACEs) up to 8.5 years. Plasma sdLDL level was measured in each patient by a direct method using automated chemistry analyzer. The patients were subsequently divided into four groups by the quartiles of sdLDL and the association of sdLDL level with MACEs in different status of glucose metabolism [DM, Pre-DM, normal glycaemia regulation (NGR)] was evaluated. Results: A total of 464 MACEs were documented. Both Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis indicated that the patients in quartile 4 but not quartile 2 or 3 of sdLDL level had significantly higher rate of MACEs than that in lowest quartile. When the prognostic value of high sdLDL was assessed in different glucose metabolism status, the results showed that the high sdLDL plus DM was associated with worse outcome after adjustment of confounding risk factors (hazard ratio: 1.83, 95% confident interval: 1.24-2.70, p < 0.05). However, no significant association was observed for high sdLDL plus Pre-DM or NGR. Conclusions: The present study firstly indicated that elevated levels of plasma sdLDL were associated with increased risk of MACEs among DM patients with proven CAD, suggesting that sdLDL may be useful for CAD risk stratification in DM.
“…However, even after intensive lowering of LDL-C, the absolute risk of events in DM patients is still higher than that in non-diabetic patients. Hypertriglyceridemia is the main feature of lipid disorder in DM and Pre-DM and could induce a sequence of compositional changes for lipid parameters including low HDL-cholesterol and type B pattern of LDL distribution [32,33]. Despite the undisputable causal role of elevated LDL-C in patients with DM [34], TG-enriched lipoproteins were significantly elevated while plasma levels of LDL-C were usually within the normal range [12].…”
Background
Recent guidelines highlighted the association between atherosclerosis and triglyceride-enriched lipoproteins in patients with impaired glucose metabolism. However, evidence from prospective studies for long-term prognostic utility of low-density lipoprotein triglyceride (LDL-TG) in real-world patients with prediabetes (Pre-DM) or diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is currently not available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of LDL-TG on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with stable CAD under different glucose metabolism status.
Methods
A total of 4381 patients with CAD were consecutively enrolled and plasma LDL-TG level was measured by an automated homogeneous assay. They were categorized according to both status of glucose metabolism [DM, Pre-DM, normal glycaemia regulation (NGR)] and tertiles of LDL-TG. All subjects were followed up for the occurrence of MACEs.
Results
During a median of 5.1 (interquartile range 3.9 to 5.9) years’ follow-up, 507 (11.6%) MACEs occurred. Cubic spline models showed a significant association between LDL-TG and MACEs in DM and Pre-DM but not in NGR. When the combined effect of elevated LDL-TG and glucose disorders was considered for risk stratification, the medium tertile of LDL-TG plus DM, and the highest tertile of LDL-TG plus Pre-DM or plus DM subgroups were associated with significantly higher risk of MACEs after adjustment of confounders including triglyceride [hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals): 1.843 (1.149–2.955), 1.828 (1.165–2.867), 2.212 (1.396–3.507), all p < 0.05]. Moreover, adding LDL-TG into the original model increased the C-statistic from 0.687 to 0.704 (∆C-statistic = 0.016, p = 0.028) and from 0.734 to 0.749 (∆C-statistic = 0.014, p = 0.002) in Pre-DM and DM, respectively.
Conclusions
In this longitudinal cohort study on real-world practice, higher LDL-TG was associated with worse outcomes among Pre-DM and DM patients with stable CAD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.