1998
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.15.1453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipoprotein Changes and Reduction in the Incidence of Major Coronary Heart Disease Events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Abstract: Background-The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) randomized 4444 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and serum cholesterol 5.5 to 8.0 mmol/L (213 to 310 mg/dL) with triglycerides Յ2.5 mmol/L (220 mg/dL) to simvastatin 20 to 40 mg or placebo once daily. Over the median follow-up period of 5.4 years, one or more major coronary events (MCEs) occurred in 622 (28%) of the 2223 patients in the placebo group and 431 (19%) of the 2221 patients in the simvastatin group (34% risk reduction, PϽ.00001). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
218
3
10

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
218
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight loss data were extracted separately for the 'last-observation-carried-forward' method of analysis, which documents weight loss for all subjects regardless of when they leave the study, and for the 'study-completers' method of analysis, which documents weight loss only for subjects who completed follow-up. (2) Effects on cardiovascular risk factors: we assessed the effect of weight loss on change in cardiovascular risk factor levels, from baseline to the end of follow-up, for five risk factors that are considered clinically important: [39][40][41] (i) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; (ii) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; (iii) triglycerides; (iv) fasting blood glucose; (v) systolic and diastolic blood pressure. (3) Applicability to clinical practice: we assessed four study design criteria that we considered relevant to the applicability of findings to clinical practice: (i) duration of study; (ii) proportion of subjects lost to follow-up; (iii) appropriate control or 'usual care' group; and (iv) weight loss effects on cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk groups.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight loss data were extracted separately for the 'last-observation-carried-forward' method of analysis, which documents weight loss for all subjects regardless of when they leave the study, and for the 'study-completers' method of analysis, which documents weight loss only for subjects who completed follow-up. (2) Effects on cardiovascular risk factors: we assessed the effect of weight loss on change in cardiovascular risk factor levels, from baseline to the end of follow-up, for five risk factors that are considered clinically important: [39][40][41] (i) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; (ii) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; (iii) triglycerides; (iv) fasting blood glucose; (v) systolic and diastolic blood pressure. (3) Applicability to clinical practice: we assessed four study design criteria that we considered relevant to the applicability of findings to clinical practice: (i) duration of study; (ii) proportion of subjects lost to follow-up; (iii) appropriate control or 'usual care' group; and (iv) weight loss effects on cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk groups.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Incremental Decrease in End points through Agressive Lipid lowering (IDEAL) study (21) compared the outcomes of treatment of atorvastatin 80 mg with simvastatin 20 mg to 40 mg (the same dose as used in the 4S study [11]) among 8888 patients with a history of MI. The primary combined end point of coronary death, nonfatal MI and survival from cardiac arrest was reduced 11% in the atorvastatin group compared with that of the simvastatin group; however, the difference for this combined end point did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.07).…”
Section: Incremental Decrease In End Points Through Aggressive Lipid mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of lowering LDL-C levels are seen in a wide range of individuals with and without known CAD, in older and diabetic patients, following myocardial infarction (MI) and among different racial groups. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) (4,11) showed that patients within the lowest tertile of LDL-C levels, between 1.5 mmol/L and 2.7 mmol/L, had the lowest coronary event rates. Analysis of the Heart Protection Study (HPS) (6) showed that the reduction in CV end points achieved with simvastatin 40 mg daily in patients with a baseline LDL-C of less than 2.6 mmol/L was similar to that in patients with higher LDL-C levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of statins in patient populations with hypertriglyceridemia. This is, in part, due to the fact that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is considered to be the principal treatment target of this class of drugs and because, until recently, the evidence implicating triglycerides (TG) as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) was equivocal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%