2022
DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Disease: A Missing Link for Premature Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and/or Residual Risk

Abstract: Lipoprotein(a) or lipoprotein "little a" [Lp(a)] is an under-recognized causal risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), including coronary atherosclerosis, aortic valvular stenosis, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease. Elevated plasma Lp(a) ($50 mg/dL or $100 nmol/L) is commonly encountered in almost 1 in 5 individuals and confers a higher CV risk compared with those with normal Lp(a) levels, although such normal levels have not been generally agreed upon. Elevated Lp(a) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although lp(a) is 198.04 ± 228.51 mg/L in the high-risk group of HFHRAT and the modified process has a lower lp(a) value, the high lp(a) still has a good effect on FH risk assessment ( 52 ). However, its effect may be covered up as a continuous variable ( 60 ), and its normal cutoff value has not yet been generally agreed upon, which could hardly be leveled into the categorical variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lp(a) is 198.04 ± 228.51 mg/L in the high-risk group of HFHRAT and the modified process has a lower lp(a) value, the high lp(a) still has a good effect on FH risk assessment ( 52 ). However, its effect may be covered up as a continuous variable ( 60 ), and its normal cutoff value has not yet been generally agreed upon, which could hardly be leveled into the categorical variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, there is a lack of clinical evidence on how aggressive lipoprotein(a) lowering reduction improves the following ASCVD risk reduction. Attention should be then maintained on the other modifiable CV risk factors ( Ruscica et al, 2021 ; Melita et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, we should acknowledge a considerable amount of outlier—especially toward higher values—that should affect statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiology has consistently demonstrated an association between high Lp(a) levels and risk of atherosclerotic disease in different vascular districts [ 93 , 94 ], and these findings were recently corroborated in mendelian randomization studies [ 95 , 96 ]. Lp(a) in the general population is primarily genetically determined (70 to 90% of the interindividual variation) [ 97 , 98 ], though impairment of renal function may also lead to “acquired” hyperlipoprotein(a)emia [ 99 ].…”
Section: Patients With Hyperlipoprotein(a)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What seems clear is that there is a positive linear association between Lp(a) levels and CV risk [ 100 , 101 ], and that values higher than 180–200 mg/dL may determine a risk such as the one endowed by HeFH [ 15 , 96 ]. Importantly, hyperlipoprotein(a)emia might turn out to be a target for the personalized reduction in the residual risk that remains in patients in secondary prevention notwithstanding a good control of traditional risk factors [ 94 , 102 , 103 ]. In a recent large epidemiological Danish study, the authors estimated that to achieve a 20% and 40% risk reduction of major adverse coronary events (MACEs) in secondary prevention, plasma Lp(a) levels should be lowered by 50 mg/dL and 99 mg/dL, respectively, for 5 years [ 104 ].…”
Section: Patients With Hyperlipoprotein(a)mentioning
confidence: 99%