1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0171-2985(11)80343-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipopolysaccharide nonresponder cells: The C3H/HeJ defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this hypothesis, we infected C3H/HeJ mice that are functionally TLR4 nonresponsive. A major deficit in this mouse strain is abrogated lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of interleukin-6 signaling, which is important for neutrophil recruitment in mice (50,63,64). Thus, these mice have abrogated neutrophil recruitment into the bladder during infection (24).…”
Section: Loss Of Capsule Results In Reduced Fitness In Functionally Tlr4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this hypothesis, we infected C3H/HeJ mice that are functionally TLR4 nonresponsive. A major deficit in this mouse strain is abrogated lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of interleukin-6 signaling, which is important for neutrophil recruitment in mice (50,63,64). Thus, these mice have abrogated neutrophil recruitment into the bladder during infection (24).…”
Section: Loss Of Capsule Results In Reduced Fitness In Functionally Tlr4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurotrophil recruitment spontaneously decreased and disappeared after 96 h. The effect of 0.3 mg ml-' LPS was also investigated on C3H mice. Figure lc shows that 3 h after inhalation of LPS, neutrophils were recruited into the BALF of the C3H/HeN mice, a strain sensitive to LPS, whereas no neutrophils were detected in the BALF of the C3H/HeJ mice, a resistant strain (Sultzer et al, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 A genetic mutation in the Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr 4) gene makes C3H/Hej mice resistant to LPS (LPS-r). [95][96][97][98] SCT from LPS-r donors results in a significant decrease in lung injury when compared to SCT using wild-type, LPS-sensitive (LPS-s) donors even though T cell responses to host antigens are identical between the two donor strains. 61 BAL cells collected from LPS-r recipients produce 30-fold less TNFa when restimulated with LPS compared to cells collected after LPS-s SCT, reproducing the phenotype of naı¨ve LPS-r and LPS-s donor cells.…”
Section: The Role Of Donor Accessory Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%