2009
DOI: 10.1080/10826070802711220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipophilicity Investigations of Ibuprofen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is characterized by low solubility (21 mg dm À3 at 25 C in water) and relative high lipophilicity (log P is in the range of 2.41-4.00 the value depends on the measurement method) which result in its poor permeation through the skin. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Due to the acidic nature (pK a ¼ 4.4), its solubility is dependent on the pH of the environmentit increases with increasing alkalinity: it can vary from 0.024 mg cm À3 (pH ¼ 2.2) to 14.8 mg dm À3 (pH ¼ 9.2). This is closely related to the increase in the ionization degree, which in turn determines the ability of ibuprofen to penetrate the skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is characterized by low solubility (21 mg dm À3 at 25 C in water) and relative high lipophilicity (log P is in the range of 2.41-4.00 the value depends on the measurement method) which result in its poor permeation through the skin. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Due to the acidic nature (pK a ¼ 4.4), its solubility is dependent on the pH of the environmentit increases with increasing alkalinity: it can vary from 0.024 mg cm À3 (pH ¼ 2.2) to 14.8 mg dm À3 (pH ¼ 9.2). This is closely related to the increase in the ionization degree, which in turn determines the ability of ibuprofen to penetrate the skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the nature of the substituent is also in accordance with the expectations that at least the values of R M 0 were recorded in all systems in the case of derivatives with the OH group as the most polar substituent, while the strongest retention in most cases was obtained for the bromide derivative. As already stated above, the chromatographic retention constant, R M 0 , is used as a measure of the lipophilicity of the compound, while the value of the chromatographic parameter m depends to a large extent on the properties of the FIGURE 1 Structure of the investigated diphenylacetamides, where R is H (1); CH 3 (2); C 2 H 5 (3); OH (4); Cl (5); Br (6); F (7); CN (8); COOCH 3 (9); COCH 3 (10) dissolved substance and its chemical structure, and is more and more used as an alternative measure of lipophilicity. For the purpose of this confirmation, R M 0 is correlated with the parameter m. The equations of the obtained linear dependences as well as the regression coefficients r are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Determination Of Lipophilicity Of Selected Diphenylacetamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the partition coefficient, log P , as a standard measure of lipophilicity, the chromatographic parameters, R M 0 and m , determined by reversed‐phase thin‐layer chromatography (RPTLC) are increasingly applied as alternative criteria of lipophilicity . The reason for this is the similarity in intermolecular interactions, which determine the chromatographic and biological behavior of one molecule . In practice, C‐18 phases are usually used for this purpose, although the tendency in using other modified stationary‐phase carriers is noted in the literature …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental values of D wat and log P were taken from Refs. [42,54,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. 1, and can provide a reference for researchers interested in studying the release of these drugs from lipidic mesophases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%