e Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a prodrug requiring conversion to pyrazinoic acid (POA) by an amidase encoded by pncA for in vitro activity. Mutation of pncA is the most common cause of PZA resistance in clinical isolates. To determine whether the systemic delivery of POA or host-mediated conversion of PZA to POA could circumvent such resistance, we evaluated the efficacy of orally administered and host-derived POA in vivo. Dose-ranging plasma and intrapulmonary POA pharmacokinetics and the efficacy of oral POA or PZA treatment against PZA-susceptible tuberculosis were determined in BALB/c and C3HeB/FeJ mice. The activity of host-derived POA was assessed in rabbits infected with a pncA-null mutant and treated with PZA. Median plasma POA values for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC 0 -ؕ ) were 139 to 222 g·h/ml and 178 to 287 g·h/ml after doses of PZA and POA of 150 mg/kg of body weight, respectively, in mice. Epithelial lining fluid POA concentrations in infected mice were comparable after POA and PZA administration. In chronically infected BALB/c mice, PZA at 150 mg/kg reduced lung CFU counts by >2 log 10 after 4 weeks. POA was effective only at 450 mg/kg, which reduced lung CFU counts by ϳ0.7 log 10 . POA had no demonstrable bactericidal activity in C3HeB/FeJ mice, nor did PZA administered to rabbits infected with a PZA-resistant mutant. Oral POA administration and host-mediated conversion of PZA to POA producing plasma POA exposures comparable to PZA administration was significantly less effective than PZA. These results suggest that the intrabacillary delivery of POA and that producing higher POA concentrations at the site of infection will be more effective strategies for maximizing POA efficacy.T he control of tuberculosis (TB) is jeopardized by the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) caused by strains which are resistant to at least rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) (1). Unfortunately, resistance to the other key sterilizing drug, pyrazinamide (PZA), is commonly present in MDR-TB isolates (2). Compounding this problem are the well-recognized challenges in performing PZA susceptibility testing, resulting in the common therapeutic conundrum of whether to include PZA in MDR-TB treatment regimens without certainty of its potential contribution (3). Whereas the mechanism of action of PZA remains partially unknown, the primary mechanism of PZA resistance in clinical isolates is well established (4, 5). Because PZA is a prodrug that requires conversion to pyrazinoic acid (POA) for its antimicrobial effect, mutations of the gene encoding the mycobacterial PncA amidase (pncA) result in PZA resistance (4-7). Approximately 78% of PZA-resistant isolates harbor mutations in pncA (3). However, since pncA mutations do not affect susceptibility to POA in vitro, direct administration of POA or delivery in a form that does not require PncA for the generation of POA inside Mycobacterium tuberculosis could circumvent this mechanism of resistance.The MIC of POA against M. tube...