2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipiodol as an Imaging Biomarker of Tumor Response After Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization: Prospective Clinical Validation in Patients with Primary and Secondary Liver Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limitations of ethiodized oil as an intra-arterial drug carrier are the heterogeneous uptake and early washout seen in some tumors. Poor ethiodized oil uptake or retention after lung TACE was associated with lower response rates in our study, similar to what has been seen after hepatic artery TACE (23). Experimental drug carriers with improved tumor uptake and specificity (27) could result in more effective local drug delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main limitations of ethiodized oil as an intra-arterial drug carrier are the heterogeneous uptake and early washout seen in some tumors. Poor ethiodized oil uptake or retention after lung TACE was associated with lower response rates in our study, similar to what has been seen after hepatic artery TACE (23). Experimental drug carriers with improved tumor uptake and specificity (27) could result in more effective local drug delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, ethiodized oil serves as a tumor-targeting drug carrier. Similarly, intra-arterial ethiodized oil is also specifically retained in hepatocellular carcinoma (20), colorectal liver metastases (21), other liver tumors (22,23), and also in tumors outside the liver such as pancreatic (24,25) and renal (26) tumors. Ethiodized oil appears to specifically localize in tumors versus normal tissue but is nonspecific for the type of tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of Lipiodol as potential imaging biomarker has been previously suggested with evidence from both retrospective and prospective data. Previous studies indicate that Lipiodol coverage on CT is correlated with subsequent necrosis on follow-up imaging and histopathology [10][11][12][13]28,32,33 . Unlike particulate-form embolic agents that usually fail to effectively penetrate the small intra-tumoral vasculature and tissue, Lipiodol, due to its oily nature, enters the tumor more readily and is retained within the tissue in a likely tumor-specific manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall reduction in viable tumor tissue was quantified as the percentage decrease in viable tumor volume between baseline and follow-up MRI. To assess radiographic tumor response of individual lesions the qEASL criteria were used because enhancement based response criteria have be shown to predict tumor necrosis after cTACE most accurate 25,[27][28][29] . According to qEASL, lesions were considered responders if they had a reduction of enhancing tumor volume of at least 65%.…”
Section: Tumor Segmentation and Mr Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our team previously showed that lipiodol deposition is higher in patients with HCC who responded to cTACE on both conventional and cone-beam computed tomography (CT) (8,11). The degree of lipiodol deposition after cTACE in patients with NET was recently shown to predict response (17), although it is still unknown if lipiodol deposition is also a predictor of response in hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastases from colorectal tumors. Moreover, the rate of lipiodol washout (beyond absolute lipiodol uptake) has not been rigorously investigated as a potential indicator of response (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%