2008
DOI: 10.1592/phco.28.3.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid‐Lowering Efficacy and Safety After Switching to Atazanavir‐Ritonavir‐Based Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract: Switching to an atazanavir-ritonavir-based HAART regimen was associated with significant improvement in lipid profiles, similar to those seen in clinical trials, without compromising safety or viral and immunologic control. In addition, more patients were able to achieve their NCEP ATP III goals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 This may explain the absence of a significant difference in IMT between the patients treated and not treated with PIs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…28,29 This may explain the absence of a significant difference in IMT between the patients treated and not treated with PIs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, 33% more patients achieved their National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III cholesterol goals, while no appreciable changes were noted in median CD4 lymphocyte count or in number of patients with undetectable HIV viral load. 23 The SWAN study was a 48-week, open-label trial involving HIV-positive patients with persisting virologic suppression who were receiving stable PI-based regimens and who were randomized 2:1 to switch to atazanavir (278 patients) or to continue to receive current PI treatment (141 patients). The proportion of randomized patients with confirmed virologic rebound through week 48 was significantly lower for those who switched to atazanavir than for those who received the comparator PI (7% versus 16%), while changes in CD4 cell count from baseline were comparable in the two treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 At the same time, substituting abacavir for PIs in subjects with persisting undetectable HIV viral load and HAART-associated dyslipidemia usually improves serum lipid concentrations and maintains virologic suppression. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] However, recent or current, but not cumulative or past use of abacavir or didanosine was associated with an increased rate of myocardial infarction in 33,347 patients enrolled in the DAD Study. Relative rate was 1.9 with abacavir and 1.49 with didanosine compared with those with no recent use of these drugs, while rates were not significantly increased in subjects who stopped these agents more than 6 months previously compared with those who had never received these drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change should be done in consultation with the provider who is managing the patients' ART. 118,119 Monitoring and Follow-up According to the European guidelines, recommendations for follow-up after beginning therapy "stem from consensus rather than evidencebased guidelines" and that "response to therapy can be assessed at 6-8 weeks from initiation or dose increases for statins, but response to fibrates and lifestyle may take longer." 48 For most patients, maximum LDL and triglyceride lowering is evident by 6 weeks after starting therapy.…”
Section: Switching Antiretroviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%