2022
DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-11-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Is There a Link? A New Focus and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Findings from meta-analyses for cohort studies have consistently indicated a null association between dietary SFA intake and breast cancer risk, whereas results for case-control studies have suggested potential positive associations, especially in postmenopausal females. [15][16][17] This pattern was in line with findings of serum SFA biomarker levels according to meta-analyses. 15,18 However, more recent observational studies have yielded conflicting conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…14 Findings from meta-analyses for cohort studies have consistently indicated a null association between dietary SFA intake and breast cancer risk, whereas results for case-control studies have suggested potential positive associations, especially in postmenopausal females. [15][16][17] This pattern was in line with findings of serum SFA biomarker levels according to meta-analyses. 15,18 However, more recent observational studies have yielded conflicting conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They contain at least one monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) chain. Higher levels of MUFAs have been reported in breast tumor tissues compared to normal tissues from the same woman [ 38 ], and some, but not others, have suggested associations of MUFAs with breast cancer risk [ 39 ]. PI(18:1/18:1) promotes cell survival and is responsive to diet and stress [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it suggested a potential inverse association between MUFA consumption and breast cancer, it was not statistically significant [92]. Similarly, other meta-analysis studies also reported that there was no significant positive or negative trend in breast cancer risk with dietary MUFA intake [85,[93][94][95]. A Korean colorectal adenoma study found that there was no significant association with MUFA intake in adults [96].…”
Section: Exogenous Mufa and Cancermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although the results of the preclinical SCD1 inhibitor studies are promising, inhibiting SCD1 could disrupt lipid metabolism, potentially affecting normal cellular functions and leading to side effects. In fact, severe adverse effects have been observed in animal studies, such as eye and skin dryness, hair loss and cold-induced hypothermia [ 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ], which is the primary challenge preventing these inhibitors from being applied to cancer therapy. Therefore, new strategies are needed before SCD1 inhibitors can be fully translated into clinical trials.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%