2019
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid content drives weed seed consumption by ground beetles (Coleopterea, Carabidae) within the smallest seeds

Abstract: Seed predation by natural predators can contribute to the regulation of the weed seedbank, hence has been acknowledged as a promising way to significantly reduce the use of chemicals and mechanical weeding to manage arable weeds. However, the complex aspects that determine seed species preference are not yet fully understood, especially, the relationship between weed seed traits and the feeding behaviour of seed predator species. In this study, we examine predation on 42 weed species by four ground beetle spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The seed dimensions explaining over 13% of the preferences was the main factor affecting seed selection [6,33,34], even when other properties are considered. The interaction between seed size and the mass of carabids should not, however, be overlooked [6,7,53]. The size of the seeds also affects their chemical properties, such as the oil content or stored energy [55], which may affect seed predation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seed dimensions explaining over 13% of the preferences was the main factor affecting seed selection [6,33,34], even when other properties are considered. The interaction between seed size and the mass of carabids should not, however, be overlooked [6,7,53]. The size of the seeds also affects their chemical properties, such as the oil content or stored energy [55], which may affect seed predation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After successfully opening, a predator further evaluates the nutritional composition of a seed (amount of starches, proteins, oils, secondary metabolites, fatty acids, etc.) [22,42,[51][52][53][54][55], which stimulates or deters the predator from additionally feeding on conspecific seeds. Some of the chemical compounds can be distasteful or poisonous for their predator (e.g., opium and L-dopa) [56], but insects have evolved systems to detoxify these compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This null model approach may show how our mechanistic models need to be refined, e.g. including the effect of traits such as seed shape, integument thickness or lipid content (Gaba, Deroulers, Bretagnolle, & Bretagnolle, 2019; Honek et al, 2007; Sebastián-González et al, 2017), or other local drivers, e.g. total seed abundance, vegetative cover or the presence of alternate invertebrate prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourthly, the effect of carabid beetles on the seedbank at t 1 by including the predation pressure index derived from the inferred carabid-seed food web in each field (see details in Pocock et al, 2020). With this last relationship, we accounts for the effectiveness of carabids in regulating arable weeds, based on their dietary preference and calorific requirement which are expected to have important implication in carabid seed consumption and contribution to weed management (Gaba et al, 2019; Honek et al, 2013; Petit et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weed seed predation by ground beetles (Coletptera:Carabidea) can reduce seed accumulation in the seedbank and contribute to weeds regulation and cropping systems (Bohan et al, 2011a; Carbonne et al, 2020; Frei et al, 2019; Kulkarni et al, 2015; Petit et al, 2018). Post-dispersal seed predation by carabid beetles is well documented, with studies having focussed on their diet and foraging behaviour (Deroulers and Bretagnolle, 2019; Gaba et al, 2019; Honek et al, 2013; Petit et al, 2014), their distribution in arable fields (Lami et al, 2020), and their response to the surrounding landscape (Petit et al, 2017; Trichard et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%