2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.06.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lip split and mandibulotomy modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Planning for large resections of the oral cavity can be challenging, and several approaches exist in order to achieve these procedures with the least functional and cosmetic deficits. Two important decisions in approaching the oral cavity involve the necessity to split the lower lip with the incision, and similarly to split the mandible to approach posterior regions of the oral cavity, tongue, and extension to the pharynx (35, 36). The risk of poor healing after mandibulotomy, fistula formation, and the cosmetic result of the lip-split incision must be weighed against the reduced surgical access with a transoral approach or visor flap, and possible functional deficits in chewing or swallowing associated with the lingual-release approach (37).…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning for large resections of the oral cavity can be challenging, and several approaches exist in order to achieve these procedures with the least functional and cosmetic deficits. Two important decisions in approaching the oral cavity involve the necessity to split the lower lip with the incision, and similarly to split the mandible to approach posterior regions of the oral cavity, tongue, and extension to the pharynx (35, 36). The risk of poor healing after mandibulotomy, fistula formation, and the cosmetic result of the lip-split incision must be weighed against the reduced surgical access with a transoral approach or visor flap, and possible functional deficits in chewing or swallowing associated with the lingual-release approach (37).…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%