2000
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200011000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lip Scars Camouflaged Using Microhair Transplantation on Male Patients

Abstract: The use of a micrograft to camouflage upper lip scars is a simple and effective method. The authors used a microhair graft to camouflage upper lip scars in one patient. Unlike other methods of scar revision, additional tissue is not killed and new incision lines are not created.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite recent advancements in cleft lip repair techniques, upper lip scars after primary cleft lip repair remain a cleft stigma; therefore, individuals with cleft lip deformity want to correct upper lip scars preferentially over other cleft nasal deformities. To improve conspicuous cleft lip scars, many camouflage techniques, such as tattooing (Kaye, 1996), dermal micrografts (Chen and Yeow, 1999), micro-hair grafts (Klç et al, 2000), and single-hair grafts (Miyamoto et al, 2007) have been attempted. However, those procedures focus on concealing the scar rather than a fundamental scar revision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent advancements in cleft lip repair techniques, upper lip scars after primary cleft lip repair remain a cleft stigma; therefore, individuals with cleft lip deformity want to correct upper lip scars preferentially over other cleft nasal deformities. To improve conspicuous cleft lip scars, many camouflage techniques, such as tattooing (Kaye, 1996), dermal micrografts (Chen and Yeow, 1999), micro-hair grafts (Klç et al, 2000), and single-hair grafts (Miyamoto et al, 2007) have been attempted. However, those procedures focus on concealing the scar rather than a fundamental scar revision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%