2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.05.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linolenic acid-modified PEG-PCL micelles for curcumin delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic high-intensity diffraction peaks of the original curcumin indicated it was in a highly crystalline form before the SEDS process. 32 However, the intensity of these characteristic diffraction peaks weakened after the SEDS process. Curcumin nanoparticles showed a lower value for the peak areas (indicative of crystallinity) than that of original curcumin (556.5 vs 828.3).…”
Section: Xrpd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic high-intensity diffraction peaks of the original curcumin indicated it was in a highly crystalline form before the SEDS process. 32 However, the intensity of these characteristic diffraction peaks weakened after the SEDS process. Curcumin nanoparticles showed a lower value for the peak areas (indicative of crystallinity) than that of original curcumin (556.5 vs 828.3).…”
Section: Xrpd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as oral formulations of CUR, many injection formulations of CUR for chemotherapy have been developed (Song et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2015;Yoon et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be relative to the appropriate proportion of hydrophobic PEG and hydrophilic PCL. 33 The hydrophobic interaction would be in favor of increasing solubility of CK, but when the length of the hydrophobic PCL exceeds a limit, it would lead to decreasing the solubility of CK. Thus, CK-M was successfully prepared, and the small size of the micelles could enhance CK concentration in tumor tissue.…”
Section: Mixed Micelle Formulation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the viability (%) of both cell types with CK-M was lower than that with CK; this may be because of the slower release from CK-M which resulted in a lower number of cells. 33 Free CK could possibly pass through the cells quickly by a passive-diffusion mechanism, while CK-M is transported into cells through endocytosis and shows a delayed release in cells. In vitro release results also support the above results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%