2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008ja013102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking two consecutive nonmerging magnetic clouds with their solar sources

Abstract: [1] On 15 May 2005, a huge interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) was observed near Earth. It triggered one of the most intense geomagnetic storms of solar cycle 23 (Dst peak = À263 nT). This structure has been associated with the two-ribbon flare, filament eruption, and coronal mass ejection originating in active region 10759 (NOAA number). We analyze here the sequence of events, from solar wind measurements (at 1 AU) and back to the Sun, to understand the origin and evolution of this geoeffective ICME. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
86
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
9
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dasso et al 2009), we minimize its importance in the estimation of the MC expansion rate by considering only the part of the velocity profile which is nearly linear with time. Still, the mean computed ζ for perturbed MCs is significantly lower than the mean value for non-perturbed MCs, showing that the overtaking flows have a more global effect on MCs (than the part where the velocity profiles significantly depart from the linear temporal behavior).…”
Section: Summary and Discussion Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dasso et al 2009), we minimize its importance in the estimation of the MC expansion rate by considering only the part of the velocity profile which is nearly linear with time. Still, the mean computed ζ for perturbed MCs is significantly lower than the mean value for non-perturbed MCs, showing that the overtaking flows have a more global effect on MCs (than the part where the velocity profiles significantly depart from the linear temporal behavior).…”
Section: Summary and Discussion Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was extensively used to estimate the orientation of MCs (see e.g., Lepping et al 1990;Bothmer & Schwenn 1998;Farrugia et al 1999;Dasso et al 2003;Gulisano et al 2005), and it provides a good orientation estimation when p is smaller than R and if the in/out bound magnetic fields are not significantly asymmetric. Gulisano et al (2007) have tested the MV using a static cylindrical Lundquist's solution.…”
Section: Coordinate Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find a deviation of the axis orientation from the model of typically 3 • for p being 30% of R. This deviation remains below 20 • for p as high as 90% of R. Another method of finding the MC orientation is called simultaneous fitting (SF). It minimizes a residual function, which takes the distance into account between the observed time series of the magnetic field and a theoretical expression containing several free parameters, which include the angles for the flux rope orientation and some physical parameters associated with the physical model assumed for the magnetic configuration in the cloud (e.g., Hidalgo et al 2002;Dasso et al 2003).…”
Section: Coordinate Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression was used to estimate H in MCs (e.g., Dasso et al 2003;Gulisano et al 2005). However, Eq.…”
Section: Magnetic Helicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest solution is obtained with a cylindrical boundary; this is the so-called Lundquist model (Lundquist 1950). It was, and is still, widely used to fit the magnetic field observed in MCs and to derive global quantities such as the magnetic flux and helicity (e.g., Burlaga 1988;Lepping et al 1990;Dasso et al 2003;Lynch et al 2003;Dasso et al 2005b;Mandrini et al 2005;Dasso et al 2006;Leitner et al 2007). An extension of this model to an elliptical boundary was realized by Vandas & Romashets (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%