2017
DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2017.1329934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking the macro to the micro: a multidimensional approach to educational inequalities in four European countries

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(22 reference statements)
3
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while these trends may account for the observed increase in overall social fluidity during the 20th century, it is not clear whether they also led to an increase in the mobility chances of individuals from unskilled working-class backgrounds. With the notable exception of an extension of compulsory schooling in all German states ( Bundesländer ) during the two decades following World War II (see Betthäuser, 2018; Müller and Haun, 1994), there have been few reforms of the German education system, which can be expected to have substantially reduced the educational inequality between this group and people from more advantaged backgrounds (see, Bukodi et al, 2018, Neugebauer et al, 2013; Schneider, 2006). Moreover, given the generally low level of educational attainment of people from disadvantaged backgrounds (Shavit and Blossfeld, 1993), it is questionable whether the trend of educational expansion in Germany has increased the educational attainment of this group to an extent that would have given rise to a weakening of the effect of their parental class background on their labour market chances.…”
Section: Why Expect Over-time Change In Social Mobility?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while these trends may account for the observed increase in overall social fluidity during the 20th century, it is not clear whether they also led to an increase in the mobility chances of individuals from unskilled working-class backgrounds. With the notable exception of an extension of compulsory schooling in all German states ( Bundesländer ) during the two decades following World War II (see Betthäuser, 2018; Müller and Haun, 1994), there have been few reforms of the German education system, which can be expected to have substantially reduced the educational inequality between this group and people from more advantaged backgrounds (see, Bukodi et al, 2018, Neugebauer et al, 2013; Schneider, 2006). Moreover, given the generally low level of educational attainment of people from disadvantaged backgrounds (Shavit and Blossfeld, 1993), it is questionable whether the trend of educational expansion in Germany has increased the educational attainment of this group to an extent that would have given rise to a weakening of the effect of their parental class background on their labour market chances.…”
Section: Why Expect Over-time Change In Social Mobility?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper class of EGP-like schemes will be too large and heterogeneous to effectively identify privilege. Moreover, this omnibus approach conflates class effects with the effects of cultural and social resources, which must be captured by separate variables (Bukodi and Goldhorpe 2013;Bukodi et al 2018;Rose and Harrison 2010). Instead, social scientists can employ these class schemes specifically as measures of the economic dimension of social position and interpret class effects as emerging from employment relations (Goldthorpe, McKnight 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And parental education could then be seen as indicating specifically educational resources in the sense of parents' capacity to further their children's educational careers through creating a supportive home learning environment and providing them with informed guidance through the educational system (Schütz et al, 2005;Pfeffer, 2008). Bukodi and Goldthorpe (2013) followed this approach in analyses of educational inequality in the British case and, together with others in two comparative studies (Bukodi, Erikson and Goldthorpe, 2014;Bukodi et al, 2018). Further British findings of relevance have then been reported in Bukodi, Bourne and Betthäuser (2017) and Bourne et al (2018).…”
Section: (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%