Linking Strategies of Organizations to Multi Agent System Typologies

Mondal, Atanu; Sharma, Rahul; Vishvakarma, Niraj Kumar

doi:10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.3.654

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It chooses the best algorithm to reach the global decision that best suited for the network. The autonomic-oriented IoT architecture supports the concept of a multi-agent system to solve the complex problems, which are out of capability of individuals (Mondal et al, 2016).…”

Section: Internet Of Things Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Innovator organizational strategy critically focuses on the highest level of capacity development, and they are ready to face challenges and willing to take a risk and grow (Miller and Roth, 1994). They have a critical focus on technology and product innovation, quickly developing and launching a new product, consistent quality and high-performance product and after sales services (Mondal et al, 2016). Other than this capability, they have a moderate emphasis on broader product and distribution line.…”

Section: Internet Of Things Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Internet of things architectures: do organizational strategies matters?

Vishwakarma

Singh

Sharma

2019

BPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The technology used by an organization is significantly influenced by the organization’s preferred competitive capabilities. The Internet of things (IoT) is an important technology, which is implemented by most prominent business organizations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between an organization’s strategies and the IoT architectures implemented by the organization. Design/methodology/approach This study has been carried out on primary data collected with the help of a structured questionnaire. The data have been analyzed by statistical techniques like cluster analysis and discriminant analysis through SPSS. Findings The empirical investigation of data revealed that there is a relationship between organizational strategy and IoT architectures. The three-layered architecture of the IoT is most suitable for caretakers; the three-, four- or five- layered architectures are suitable for marketeers; whereas innovators find it more suitable to use five- or more-layered architecture of the IoT. This paper draws the conclusion based on maximum likelihood rather than using statistical analyses like ANOVA. The idea behind using the maximum likelihood estimate is that there are many subjective parameters in deciding the architectures of the IoT. These subjective parameters are difficult to quantify, so it is not possible to apply ANOVA on these parameters. Research limitations/implications This study considers three organizational strategies; the relationship between other organizational strategies and IoT architecture will be studied in future. Practical implications This study offers multiple opportunities to practitioners and consulting firms of the IoT to adopt a suitable IoT architecture according to the organizational strategy. This study equips IoT development engineers to select suitable technology for data capturing, data transmission, and data management and access for an IoT architecture. Originality/value Although a lot of work has already been done on the architecture of IoT for different industries and businesses, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that relates organizational strategies to IoT architectures. This study applies to all the major industry types.

show abstract

Section: Internet Of Things Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Internet Of Things Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet of things architectures: do organizational strategies matters?

Vishwakarma

Singh

Sharma

2019

BPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When a company concentrates on a certain consumer group or target specialty, it is said to be in focus. Also emphasized is using a restricted competitive range within a given market (Mondal et al, 2016, Niraj Kumar Vishvakarma, 2016.…”

Section: Organization Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This assisted us in determining the character of an organization, whether it is formal, semi-formal, or informal, and how to best approach them. A structural feature that affects the choice of organizational structure is centralization, specialization, and complexity of workflow (Mondal et al, 2016, N. K. Vishvakarma et al, 2015. Centralization is prevalent in cost leadership companies since all workers work together.…”

Section: Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Relating Analytics for Employee Turnover to Strategy of Organizations

Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Companies spend a lot of time and money training their employees, and when they leave, it hurts. When employees leave the company, it's important to know why they're leaving. An organization can't apply the same analytical method for each and every one of its employees, regardless of the industry or kind of business. We created two groups called cost leaders and differentiators to categorize firms based on strategy, structure, and uncertainty. In order to decrease employee turnover, cost leaders utilize 'predictive/prescriptive analytics, whereas differentiation leaders use 'descriptive/diagnostic' analytics to do so. It is critical for HR Analytics to pay attention to the organization's strategy and structure.

show abstract