2021
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking socioeconomic disadvantage to healthiness of food practices: Can a practice‐theoretical perspective sharpen everyday life analysis?

Abstract: Food is one of the key themes in public health policy and debates over inequalities in health. In this article, we argue that more research is needed to understand how socioeconomic disadvantage is translated into low degrees of healthiness. We suggest that everyday life analysis may be sharpened by way of drawing upon a practice‐theoretical perspective on the mundane processes involved in this translation. We base our suggestion on a small review of three strands in the literature on social inequality, food a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, eating patterns are interconnected with social meanings and norms, food values, identity markers and perceptions of health and well-being [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Hence, the literature shows that interventions that target behavioural changes in relation to diet may well benefit from including social aspects that could facilitate or impede such changes [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, eating patterns are interconnected with social meanings and norms, food values, identity markers and perceptions of health and well-being [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Hence, the literature shows that interventions that target behavioural changes in relation to diet may well benefit from including social aspects that could facilitate or impede such changes [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most such studies use an explicit starting point in practice theories (Reckwitz, 2002;Schatzki, 2002). The empirical studies tend to investigate the organisation and performance of consumption as part of practices in different areas of everyday life, including normative processes (Sahakian, 2022;Plessz and Wahlen, 2022;Welch, 2020;Castelo et al, 2021;Fuentes et al, 2021;Gram-Hanssen, 2021;Halkier and Holm, 2021). This body of research is key to providing knowledge about the mundane dynamics of consumption.…”
Section: Existing Research: the Normative In Consumption As Reflected...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is inspired by Warde's understanding of conventions. However, it uses the term mundane normativity instead of conventions, to signal a focus on processes in the study of the normative in social action (Halkier and Holm, 2021). Normativity describes the processes of handling appropriateness in practising something rather than merely describing the content of the conventions in themselves.…”
Section: Mundane Normativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such normative judgement plays an important role in social inequality, as also highlighted by Sayer (2005). Social hierarchy, according to Halkier and Holm (2021) is thus related to normative inequality. Applied to food governance practices, this means that some forms of doing sustainable food are considered better than others in particular spaces of intelligibility, as illustrated above.…”
Section: Governance and Spaces Of Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They also suggest a return to Bourdieu, through the notion of 'social hierarchy', which although not explicitly mentioned, can be directly linked to the concepts of (mis)recognition, doxa and symbolic power. Social hierarchy, Halkier and Holm (2021) state, is at play when normative judgement is applied "when differences in the ways in which something is practiced [...] are understood on a scale of being more or less appropriate" (p.758). Such normative judgement plays an important role in social inequality, as also highlighted by Sayer (2005).…”
Section: Governance and Spaces Of Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%