2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36230-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking paranormal and conspiracy beliefs to illusory pattern perception through signal detection theory

Abstract: Previous research indicates that irrational beliefs (Paranormal beliefs & conspiracy theory endorsement) are associated with the perception of patterns in noise, but the previous findings do not conclusively describe this relationship. This study aims to disentangle the underlying parameters of this association by applying a signal detection theory approach, thus allowing to distinguish illusory pattern perception (false alarms) from perceptual sensitivity and response tendencies—while also taking base rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability to preserve conceptual boundaries could also explain the higher divergence we found in compound generation in conspiracist texts. Conspiracy believers have been found to connect unrelated events and draw implausible connections (Müller & Hartmann, 2023; van der Wal et al., 2018; van Prooijen, Douglas, & De Inocencio, 2018). Likewise, conspiracist texts show lower textual cohesion compared to mainstream texts and conspiratorial semantic networks are more interconnected than those in mainstream texts (Miani et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability to preserve conceptual boundaries could also explain the higher divergence we found in compound generation in conspiracist texts. Conspiracy believers have been found to connect unrelated events and draw implausible connections (Müller & Hartmann, 2023; van der Wal et al., 2018; van Prooijen, Douglas, & De Inocencio, 2018). Likewise, conspiracist texts show lower textual cohesion compared to mainstream texts and conspiratorial semantic networks are more interconnected than those in mainstream texts (Miani et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOOSE AND TIGHT The inability to preserve conceptual boundaries could also explain the higher divergence we found in compound generation in conspiracist texts. Conspiracy believers have been found to connect unrelated events and draw implausible connections (Müller & Hartmann, 2023;van Prooijen et al, 2018). Likewise, conspiracist texts show lower textual cohesion compared to mainstream texts and conspiratorial semantic networks are more interconnected than those in mainstream texts (Miani et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%