2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we adjusted the translation content for Chinese students, students may still have difficulties in understanding specific options. The third reason seems to be that the participants' perception of the online learning community could be a little bit lower than that of some previous studies (Swan, Matthews, Bogle, Boles, & Day, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although we adjusted the translation content for Chinese students, students may still have difficulties in understanding specific options. The third reason seems to be that the participants' perception of the online learning community could be a little bit lower than that of some previous studies (Swan, Matthews, Bogle, Boles, & Day, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The optimisation achieved has made it possible to improve the learning outcomes of the students, as stated by Swan, Matthews, Bogle, Boles & Day (2012). The results were included in personalised, confidential reports for each teaching team.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] From a collaborative constructivist point of view, it represents online learning as supported by three presences: social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence. [13] The framework hypothesizes online knowledge building as the outcome of collaborative work among active participants in learning communities reflecting instructional coordination appropriate to the online environments (teaching presence) and an encouraging collegial online setting (social presence). [13] Although the COI has been one of the most commonly referenced means for researching formal higher-level online education, it has been criticized particularly due to the limited nature of a constructivist orientation, rather than an outcomes-based measure within an objectivist orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The framework hypothesizes online knowledge building as the outcome of collaborative work among active participants in learning communities reflecting instructional coordination appropriate to the online environments (teaching presence) and an encouraging collegial online setting (social presence). [13] Although the COI has been one of the most commonly referenced means for researching formal higher-level online education, it has been criticized particularly due to the limited nature of a constructivist orientation, rather than an outcomes-based measure within an objectivist orientation. [14] Shea and Bidjerano proposed a revised version of the COI (RCOI) framework that incorporated the effects of individual learner attributes on learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%