Linking mesoscale landscape heterogeneity and biodiversity: gardens and tree cover significantly modify flower-visiting beetle communities

Abstract

Context Maintaining biodiversity in multifunction landscapes is a significant challenge. Planning for the impacts of change requires knowledge of how species respond to landscape heterogeneity. Some insect groups are known to respond to heterogeneity at the mesoscale, defined here as hundreds of metres. However, for many taxa these effects are poorly known. Objectives To identify key elements of mesoscale landscape heterogeneity influencing community composition in flower-visiting beetles, and whether landscape explains any variation in beetle communities beyond that driven by immediate habitat cover. Methods Flower-visiting beetles were sampled from 36 transects, laid out using a 6 km 2 grid located in southern Britain. Landscape heterogeneity was measured for 30 and 200 m buffers around the transects and the relative response of beetle communities to each assessed using ordination analyses followed by variation partitioning. Results The composition of immediately adjacent habitat (30 m) and mesoscale landscape heterogeneity (200 m) explained unique portions of the variation in flower-visiting beetle communities. A number of species, including those affiliated with deadwood habitats, were positively linked to tree cover in the surrounding mesoscale landscape. Gardens covered a smaller area than trees but modified beetle communities to the same extent. Conclusions The local abundance of some flowervisiting beetles is modified by the composition of the surrounding landscape. Results highlight the importance of tree cover for maintaining insect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, while suggesting that gardens associated with small urban areas may have a disproportionate influence on biodiversity.

Landscape diversity influences the arthropod species diversity in the rice field

“…However, the farmland landscape diversity promotes wild pollinators and plant reproduction, increases wild bee abundance, and increases the seed set of some crops (for example, Raphanus sativus) through enhanced connectivity (Annika et al, 2018). Increased diversity of crop fields may also promote the diversity of insect pollinators (Dennis et al, 1998;Hass et al, 2018;Foster et al, 2019). Conversely, crop diversity can reduce bee abundance if particularly intensive management practices are adopted (Annika et al, 2018).…”

Interactive Application of Virtual Reality and Intelligent Big Data in Landscape Design

“…Finally, Section V sums up some conclusions and gives some suggestions as the future research topics. [14,15]. e idea of PAM algorithm is to take the data set with n landscape simulation system evaluation index samples and the number of clusters K as the input, and the output result is K clusters.…”

Effects of urbanisation and landscape heterogeneity mediated by feeding guild and body size in a community of coprophilous beetles

“…Though not a complete substitute, sampling insects on ecotones using a common attractant, such as baited traps or flowers (e.g. Foster et al 2019), may provide a snapshot of landscape biodiversity that can be assessed at a large number of sites relatively easily. Such a method can be carried out in urban sites as well as rural, where a habitat-focussed experimental design is not always feasible.…”