2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking mesopelagic prey abundance and distribution to the foraging behavior of a deep-diving predator, the northern elephant seal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study, which aimed to reveal how marine mammals forage efficiently in the biota‐poor OMZ, depended on the accuracy of measurements of energy gain by the jaw motion recorder, that is, accuracy in the number of JME as a comparative index of the amount of prey consumed by the seals. From our previous study, we predicted that JME was a reliable index of digested prey mass based on the following empirical reasons related to the narrow prey size distribution: (1) They use a suction feeding mode functional for feeding on small prey (Bloodworth & Marshall, ; Marshall, Kovacs, & Lydersen, ; Suzuki, Naito, Folkow, Miyazaki, & Blix, ); (2) their morphologically degenerate molar teeth are less functional for feeding on large prey (Abbott & Verstraete, ); (3) small fish, that is, micronekton, are dominant in the mesopelagic zone (Cherel et al., ; Irigoien et al., ; Naito et al., ; Robinson, Steinberg, et al., ; Robison, ); and (4) the body size distribution of the dominant animals captured by mesopelagic trawling in the 400–800 m depth in the same area of the Northeast Pacific is very small (Saijo et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study, which aimed to reveal how marine mammals forage efficiently in the biota‐poor OMZ, depended on the accuracy of measurements of energy gain by the jaw motion recorder, that is, accuracy in the number of JME as a comparative index of the amount of prey consumed by the seals. From our previous study, we predicted that JME was a reliable index of digested prey mass based on the following empirical reasons related to the narrow prey size distribution: (1) They use a suction feeding mode functional for feeding on small prey (Bloodworth & Marshall, ; Marshall, Kovacs, & Lydersen, ; Suzuki, Naito, Folkow, Miyazaki, & Blix, ); (2) their morphologically degenerate molar teeth are less functional for feeding on large prey (Abbott & Verstraete, ); (3) small fish, that is, micronekton, are dominant in the mesopelagic zone (Cherel et al., ; Irigoien et al., ; Naito et al., ; Robinson, Steinberg, et al., ; Robison, ); and (4) the body size distribution of the dominant animals captured by mesopelagic trawling in the 400–800 m depth in the same area of the Northeast Pacific is very small (Saijo et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use a suction feeding mode functional for feeding on small prey (Bloodworth & Marshall, 2005;Marshall, Kovacs, & Lydersen, 2008;Suzuki, Naito, Folkow, Miyazaki, & Blix, 2009); (2) their morphologically degenerate molar teeth are less functional for feeding on large prey (Abbott & Verstraete, 2005); (3) small fish, that is, micronekton, are dominant in the mesopelagic zone (Cherel et al, 2008;Irigoien et al, 2014;Naito et al, 2013;Robinson, Steinberg, et al, 2010;Robison, 2004); and (4) the body size distribution of the dominant animals captured by mesopelagic trawling in the 400-800 m depth in the same area of the Northeast Pacific is very small (Saijo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Body Mass Effect and The Size Of Preymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transect was determined at sea by the real-time Argos locations of 16 concurrently tracked female elephant seals (Figure 1), and sampling was conducted at depths where elephant seals routinely forage (Robinson et al, 2012). Potential prey samples were collected during four midwater trawls (10 mm mesh at the cod end, 314 m 2 net mouth, and tow speed of 3.5-4 knots; Saijo et al, 2017), two during the day (maximum depths of 730 and 720 m), and two at night (both at 650 m). Automatic squid jigs (surface to 650 m, Towa-denki Seisakusho Co., Ltd.) were also used to collect samples of active, vertically migrating squid.…”
Section: Collecting the Prey Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems very plausible that sperm whales are targeting warty squid during their dives to 400-600 m in mid-water during the day, and possibly during demersal foraging at night. Strong associations with the DSL have been shown for many deep-diving top predators including pilot whales (Abecassis et al 2015), elephant seals (Saijo et al 2016) and Blainville's beaked whales (Arranz et al 2011), for which circadian changes in foraging behaviour have been associated with changes in the vertical distribution of their prey.…”
Section: Sperm Whale Preymentioning
confidence: 99%