2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-2671(09)33241-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking health care administrative data and laboratory data to study differences in progression of diabetic renal disease in first nations people and other saskatchewan residents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus in both DRUID and two remote Indigenous studies, the proportion of participants with albuminuria was several-fold higher than the proportion with low eGFR, whereas the converse was seen in AusDiab. That the ratio of albuminuria to low eGFR is greater in Indigenous than non-Indigenous Australians is also consistent with findings of the NEFRON Study (Australian primary care) [ 26 ] and a recent report comparing First Nations People to other residents of Saskatchewan, Canada [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus in both DRUID and two remote Indigenous studies, the proportion of participants with albuminuria was several-fold higher than the proportion with low eGFR, whereas the converse was seen in AusDiab. That the ratio of albuminuria to low eGFR is greater in Indigenous than non-Indigenous Australians is also consistent with findings of the NEFRON Study (Australian primary care) [ 26 ] and a recent report comparing First Nations People to other residents of Saskatchewan, Canada [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although speculative, the duration of exposure to diabetes and its interaction with other variables (e.g., quality of diabetes management) might be an important determinant in the relative likelihood of developing specific diabetic complications such as diabetic end-stage renal disease. 32 This should also be a priority area for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%