2003
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/14.2.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking foraging behavior to lifetime reproductive success for an insect parasitoid: adaptation to host distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where colony-specific resources differ, substantially different foraging strategies may be favoured at each location, each maximising lifetime reproductive output relative to background resource availability (Endler 1977, Suryan et al 2000, Vos & Hemerik 2002. Entrained by population-specific foraging behaviour, physiological characteristics such as chick developmental patterns may also diverge and become population-specific (Arendt 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where colony-specific resources differ, substantially different foraging strategies may be favoured at each location, each maximising lifetime reproductive output relative to background resource availability (Endler 1977, Suryan et al 2000, Vos & Hemerik 2002. Entrained by population-specific foraging behaviour, physiological characteristics such as chick developmental patterns may also diverge and become population-specific (Arendt 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 below), and (2) the interval between encounters with prey (IBE) from an exponential distribution. On each leaf the predator encounters and eats a prey item (if drawn GUT [ drawn IBE) or leaves the patch (when drawn GUT B drawn IBE), like in earlier simulation studies (Driessen and Hemerik 1992;Driessen and Bernstein 1999;Vos and Hemerik 2003;Wajnberg et. al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the encounter rate of prey items, the same approach is used as in the appendix of Vos and Hemerik (2003). Those authors assume that both the IBEs and the GUTs result from an exponential distribution with parameters r enc and h 0 , respectively.…”
Section: Other Rate Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…concluded by ovipositions, as soon as not all modules are acceptable, that is α < 1), an assumption fairly admissible and commonly referred to (Sugimoto, 1980: 15;Kuhlmann et al, 1998;Wool & Ben-Zvi, 1998;Kagata & Ohgushi, 2002;Vos & Hemerik, 2003;Ives & Godfray, 2006);…”
Section: A Brief Summary Of the "Melba" Procedures Assumptions Involvementioning
confidence: 99%