Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation to Environmental Collaboration: A Stakeholder Theory and Evidence from Multinational Companies in an Emerging Market

Abstract

Revisiting stakeholder theory as a potential theory of the firm giving rise to expectations about organizing, we analyze when and under what circumstances entrepreneurially oriented firms increase their environmental collaboration with suppliers. Specifically, we investigate the association between entrepreneurial orientation and environmental collaboration with suppliers by accounting for the degree of employees' work engagement and market environment complexity as stakeholder-oriented moderators of this relationship. We test our hypotheses using multi-level analyses on 249 managers nested in 66 multinational companies (MNCs) in Turkey. We find that entrepreneurial orientation positively impacts environmental collaboration with suppliers. A high level of work engagement (as an organizing principle favouring a stakeholder focus) and a low level of market environment complexity (as an organizing principle favouring the customer as an instrumental stakeholder) moderate this linkage. We enrich the debate on entrepreneurial orientation, strategy, and environmental sustainability by providing logic rooted in stakeholder theory of the conditions under which MNCs' entrepreneurial orientation in emerging markets prioritizes and privileges environmental collaboration with suppliers.

Building competitive advantages and business success: the role of learning orientation, reward systems and entrepreneurial orientation

“…This decision is consistent with the criterion of Hair et al (2022) that all indicators not meeting the required benchmark can be deleted from the measurement model. Although it can be considered a study limitation, several studies measure EO as a unidimensional construct (Aftab et al , 2022; Bouguerra et al , 2022; Purkayastha and Gupta, 2022).…”

The Context Sensitivity of International Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Role of Process and Product Innovation Capabilities

“…Drawing on a contingency perspective of the resourcebased view (RBV) (Engelen et al, 2015), given weak process and product innovation capabilities, IEO-driven efforts will lead firms to use resources unproductively, escalating a failure trap that causes vulnerable LIFs to fail internationally. Hence, using the RBV (Barney, 1991) along with its contingency perspective (Engelen et al, 2015), we test whether process and product innovation capabilities moderate the conversion of IEOdriven efforts into successful international performance among LIFs, especially for those firms in an institutionally and environmentally challenged economy in which environmental turbulence is commonplace (Bouguerra et al, 2022;Kearney, Soleimanof and Wales, 2018). Taken together, we propose that an IEO-performance relationship is sensitive to firm-specific capabilities essential for LIFs to succeed in international markets.…”

Social ties, absorptive capacity, and the adoption of green innovation: a social capital perspective

“…Recently, going green has become an almost inescapable strategic choice enabling firms to manage increasingly urgent environmental issues (Wang and Juo, 2021). Environmental degradation and intensifying stakeholder pressure for sustainable progress are compelling firms to behave ethically and incorporate environmental issues into corporate plans (Bouguerra et al, 2022;Cheng et al, 2017). To deal with growing environmental pressure, firms are rapidly recognizing the significance of adopting green innovation (GI).…”