2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking Ecohydrology and Integrated Water Resources Management: Institutional challenges for water management in the Pangani Basin, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foster and Ait-Kadi [32] argued that for effective groundwater management, the hydrogeological delineation would serve better than river/lake basin delineation. The effectiveness and coordination between various institutions and governance entities, including town authorities, has not been well addressed [37,93]. Effectiveness of the basin organizations in Uganda, Ghana, and Tanzania is as well in infancy stages, trying to establish legitimacy in the already existing institutional framework [37,40,85].…”
Section: Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foster and Ait-Kadi [32] argued that for effective groundwater management, the hydrogeological delineation would serve better than river/lake basin delineation. The effectiveness and coordination between various institutions and governance entities, including town authorities, has not been well addressed [37,93]. Effectiveness of the basin organizations in Uganda, Ghana, and Tanzania is as well in infancy stages, trying to establish legitimacy in the already existing institutional framework [37,40,85].…”
Section: Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilateral organisations including the World Bank has consistently call for decentralised governance in the areas of health care, education and natural resource management in less developed countries owing to the benefits of decentralisation (World Bank 2004). Nevertheless, numerous stakeholders comprising water user groups at the community levels often do not have adequate funding and institutional competence to significantly contribute to the management of community level water resource systems (Acheampong 2011;Knüppea and Meissner 2016;Msuya and Lalika 2018). The lack of funding and institutional competence has been identified as a major setback to the decentralisation concept and has significantly affected local level water management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, a proper approach in the management of community level water resource systems in the long-term ensures sustainable water supply to households (Yeleliere et al 2018;Kelly et al 2017) and remain an important component of bringing sustainability to water utilisation (Opare 2011;Distanont et al 2017). Managing sustainable water supply successfully at the local level means operating and maintaining a water supply system on a day-to-day basis so that the system continuous to work and supply water as planned (Msuya and Lalika 2018;Okpara et al 2018). In development discourse, sustainable water supply influences development as well as promote better health and living conditions which explicitly impact on social, economic and community development (Tantoh and Simatele 2018;Knüppea and Meissner 2016;Apipalakul et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This promising approach, however, faces operational and financial challenges. In application, integration of multiple subsystems is required (Msuya and Lalika, 2017;Xia et al, 2017). Strategy implementation requires inter-sectoral coordination at a basin-wide level while addressing incompatible, multi-source, data with different formats (Shao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sponge City Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%