2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking canopy scattering of far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with reflectance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
195
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the leaf scale, we show that the spectrally integrated spectrum is only modulated by 8% through the reabsorption of emitted ChlF, but by up to about 20% in the red region (Figure c); notably, the spectral and sample weights would be significantly amplified for highly chlorotic leaves, which are not included in this study. However, at the canopy scale, we do observe an amplification of the red:far‐red SIF ratio during senescence (Figure d) because more red photons are prone to escape the canopy when leaves become highly chlorotic (Figures S9 and S10; Fournier et al, ; Goulas et al, ; Yang & van der Tol, ). Further, while we attribute PC2 at steady‐state changes primarily to chlorophyll concentration, confounding effects of leaf‐level radiative transfer should not be negated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the leaf scale, we show that the spectrally integrated spectrum is only modulated by 8% through the reabsorption of emitted ChlF, but by up to about 20% in the red region (Figure c); notably, the spectral and sample weights would be significantly amplified for highly chlorotic leaves, which are not included in this study. However, at the canopy scale, we do observe an amplification of the red:far‐red SIF ratio during senescence (Figure d) because more red photons are prone to escape the canopy when leaves become highly chlorotic (Figures S9 and S10; Fournier et al, ; Goulas et al, ; Yang & van der Tol, ). Further, while we attribute PC2 at steady‐state changes primarily to chlorophyll concentration, confounding effects of leaf‐level radiative transfer should not be negated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…From this work, several findings have implications for remote sensing of the SIF spectral shape: (1) across a wide range of species, ~85% of the spectral variance in ChlF can be explained by changes in the magnitude of a mean spectral shape. This implies that the spectral shape is quite stable and that all wavelength ranges respond to changes in variable PSII fluorescence yield driven by PQ and NPQ; (2) far‐red SIF is more closely correlated to photosynthesis and APAR than red SIF (Figures ), because it is less prone to re‐absorption by Chl at both leaf and canopy scales (Fournier et al, ; Yang & van der Tol, ). At the canopy scale, the strong correlation between SIF and APAR (Figures and ) confirms previous results in crop canopies (Miao et al, ; Yang et al, ), which makes intuitive sense since APAR covaries with seasonal changes in leaf area in these systems, and is prone to less error than calculated GPP fluxes; and (3) Since wavelengths in the far‐red spectrum are less impacted by confounding factors such as chlorophyll or canopy structure (Figure S12), current satellite retrievals in this region may be better suited to assess stress induced downregulation of photosynthesis than changes in the ChlF spectral shape alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides EVI data, satellite SIF signal is affected by bidirectional effects from the Sun‐surface‐sensor geometry (Guanter et al, ; Köhler et al, ; Yang & Van Der Tol, ; Zhang, Zhang, et al, ). Considering the impact, Köhler et al () reported that the normalized GOME‐2 SIF data have the peak around January/February (wet season) and at the end of the dry season (September) and the annual dip during the early dry season (May and June) in Amazon evergreen broadleaf forests, which is similar to the SIF seasonality in Figure a in this study that ignored the bidirectional effect on SIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013; Yang and van der Tol, 2018). Many previous studies have shown high correlation between SIF and vegetation indices (VIs), especially VIs related to the chlorophyll concentration (Frankenberg et al, 2011;Guanter et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%