2019
DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v17i4.3625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking Bitstream Information to QoE: A Study on Still Images Using HEVC Intra Coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep CNNs have been largely used in media quality assessment despite the lack of large scale subjectively annotated datasets necessary for an effective training process [31,32,33,34,35,36]. To overcome the lack of training samples, many authors relied on transfer learning approaches [37,38] and data augmentation methods [39,40,41,42]. The computer vision community has developed a number of data augmentation approaches [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deep CNNs have been largely used in media quality assessment despite the lack of large scale subjectively annotated datasets necessary for an effective training process [31,32,33,34,35,36]. To overcome the lack of training samples, many authors relied on transfer learning approaches [37,38] and data augmentation methods [39,40,41,42]. The computer vision community has developed a number of data augmentation approaches [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [39,40], in addition to the subjectively annotated training samples, the authors created new training samples for which they computed objective measures to be used as a substitute of the MOS. The authors in [41,42], instead, proposed an approach to combine different subjectively annotated datasets into a single larger one, thus overcoming the issues stemming from the different contexts in which the subjective experiments have been conducted. In particular, the MOS values have to be realigned to take into consideration the context influence factors that may affect the result of each experiment in several different ways [44].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation