2013
DOI: 10.3109/17518423.2012.733438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking autism measures with the ICF-CY: Functionality beyond the borders of diagnosis and interrater agreement issues

Abstract: The linkage between the ICF-CY and the analyzed measures provides a way to document assessment-intervention outcomes using a common language, as well as to integrate diagnostic and functional data. Diagnostic measurements provide functional information beyond the diagnostic criteria defined for autism. A functional perspective is added to diagnostic outcomes, thus better informing educational and rehabilitation practices for children with ASD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive research has also been conducted on mapping extant measurements with items of currently used measurements for child development, health, and disability to the ICF-CY functioning dimensions. Relevant examples include the autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS; Lord et al, 2011) and the schedule of growing skills (SGS II; Bellman et al, 1996), which have been mapped to the classification's items (Castro et al, 2013(Castro et al, , 2014a.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has also been conducted on mapping extant measurements with items of currently used measurements for child development, health, and disability to the ICF-CY functioning dimensions. Relevant examples include the autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS; Lord et al, 2011) and the schedule of growing skills (SGS II; Bellman et al, 1996), which have been mapped to the classification's items (Castro et al, 2013(Castro et al, , 2014a.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICF framework also incorporates the influence of contextual factors (personal and environmental) on function. This framework has increasingly been utilized as a conceptual framework for outcomes measurement in health and disability research for a variety of clinical populations, including youth with developmental disabilities and autism (Bonanni, et al, 2009; Castro, et al 2013; Poon, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), we focused on the analysis of section E (the outcomes) in the EHC plans, and the GFS II (McWilliam, 2005) was used to rate each one of the outcomes on a scale from 1 to 4: not at all, somewhat, much, or very much. 10% of the outcomes were randomly selected using an automatic number generator and cross-checked by two coders; where agreement was not reached, a third judge with similar expertise was called to support decision-making regarding the final coding, in order to increase trustworthiness, as performed in other similar studies (Castro et al, 2013(Castro et al, , 2019. In order to test the likelihood of frequency of high quality ratings per local authority, type of school and type of need, assumptions for running ordinal logistic regression were tested; Because the assumption of proportional odds required to perform ordinal logistic regression was not met, the outcome variables (quality criteria) were converted into dichotomous variables where low quality includes not at all and somewhat and high quality includes much and very much ratings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%