2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2010.5516292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking an integrated framework with appropriate methods for measuring QoE

Abstract: Quality of Experience (QoE) has recently gained recognition for being an important determinant of the success of new technologies. Despite the growing interest in QoE, research into this area is still fragmented. Similar -but separate -efforts are being carried out in technical as well as user oriented research domains, which are rarely communicating with each other. In this paper, we take a multidisciplinary approach and review both user oriented and technical definitions on Quality of Experience (including t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of any timerelated data in the analysis process implicitly denies much of the dynamic nature of the user's usage behavior [13] or experience with a service. Nevertheless, the user's behavior and experience continuously change over time, and are influenced by his or her prior expectations about the service [12]. Before people start using a particular product or service, they tend to already have some kind of preconception influencing their expectations [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of any timerelated data in the analysis process implicitly denies much of the dynamic nature of the user's usage behavior [13] or experience with a service. Nevertheless, the user's behavior and experience continuously change over time, and are influenced by his or her prior expectations about the service [12]. Before people start using a particular product or service, they tend to already have some kind of preconception influencing their expectations [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are studies which examine the influence of: (a) device characteristics [13]; (b) manipulating content, bit rate, frame rate and audio quality [2] (c) adaptation parameters such as playback time and switch amplitude in video streaming context [14], [15]; and (d) quality of service arbitration [16], [17]. However, even those that do take human factors into consideration and explore human-computer interaction typically only include basic demographic variables such as gender, age group and level of expertise [18], [19]. These may be insufficient to generalize the findings to a broader population because of the possibility of idiosyncratic rater effects [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the user's experience can change over time, and is influenced by his or her prior expectations about the service [8]. Before people start using a particular product or service, they tend to already have some kind of preconception influencing their expectations [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%