2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23783-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Link Prediction via Matrix Factorization

Abstract: Abstract. We propose to solve the link prediction problem in graphs using a supervised matrix factorization approach. The model learns latent features from the topological structure of a (possibly directed) graph, and is shown to make better predictions than popular unsupervised scores. We show how these latent features may be combined with optional explicit features for nodes or edges, which yields better performance than using either type of feature exclusively. Finally, we propose a novel approach to addres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
294
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
294
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-class MF is a case of PU (positive-unlabeled) learning [10], which includes other important applications such as link prediction [17]. Our proposed optimization methods can be easily applied to them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-class MF is a case of PU (positive-unlabeled) learning [10], which includes other important applications such as link prediction [17]. Our proposed optimization methods can be easily applied to them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, similar properties such as transitivity and homophily have been observed for positive links [99,77]; trust prediction algorithms perform well with positive links [57,77]; and many trust application frameworks can be directly applied to positive links [82,46]. Since distrust is a special type of negative links, a natural question here is whether we can generalize some properties and algorithms of distrust to negative links such as foes and dislike.…”
Section: Generalizing Findings Of Distrustmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We used the area under the ROC curve (AUC) measure, which is not influenced by the imbalance distribution of the classes [10], for evaluation of different classification models. Additionally, we used the Precision and Recall measures in order to verify the ranking performance of our algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%