2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610848104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin

Abstract: The correlations between interpopulation genetic and linguistic diversities are mostly noncausal (spurious), being due to historical processes and geographical factors that shape them in similar ways. Studies of such correlations usually consider allele frequencies and linguistic groupings (dialects, languages, linguistic families or phyla), sometimes controlling for geographic, topographic, or ecological factors. Here, we consider the relation between allele frequencies and linguistic typological features. Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
242
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(48 reference statements)
4
242
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of causal correlations between inter-population genetic and linguistic diversities of the type suggested by Dediu and Ladd (2007) is potentially very important for a better understanding of the biological bases of language as well as the evolution of language and linguistic diversity (for a detailed discussion of these issues in the context of biolinguistics see Ladd et al, 2008). A very convincing support for the fact that learning biases can affect the outcome of trans-generational learning is provided, for example, by Feher et al (2008), which reared in social and acoustic isolation song-learning male zebra finches, resulting in highly abnormal songs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The existence of causal correlations between inter-population genetic and linguistic diversities of the type suggested by Dediu and Ladd (2007) is potentially very important for a better understanding of the biological bases of language as well as the evolution of language and linguistic diversity (for a detailed discussion of these issues in the context of biolinguistics see Ladd et al, 2008). A very convincing support for the fact that learning biases can affect the outcome of trans-generational learning is provided, for example, by Feher et al (2008), which reared in social and acoustic isolation song-learning male zebra finches, resulting in highly abnormal songs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each run, there are two types of measures of interest: those reflecting the overall correlations between genetic diversity, linguistic diversity and geography, on one hand, and the specific correlations between the frequencies of the alleles and the frequencies of linguistic features across populations, on the other. For the first type of measures, Mantel correlations (Mantel, 1967) 7 involving the genetic distances (Nei, 1972; considering both G 1 and G 2 ), linguistic distances (Euclidean distances on the space of both features F 1 and F 2 ; Dediu and Ladd, 2007) and geographic distances (Euclidean distances between regions) between populations were computed: GenGeo (genetic and geographic 6 Given that the alleles are selectively neutral and independent, the only evolutionary process affecting their frequencies is random drift in large populations, so that these frequencies tend to remain constant during the simulations.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been shown, for example, that the ability to identify incorrect tones in familiar melodies is a highly heritable trait, with genetic factors explaining up to 80% of variability in this ability (Drayna et al 2001). Moreover, there is evidence that the adoption of tone languages is associated with the frequency in the population of specific alleles of two genes related to brain growth, and this association is hard to explain by geographical or historical factors (Dediu and Ladd 2007). Studies comparing pitch-processing measures between different populations of listeners cannot disentangle the contribution of neural plasticity from the contribution of genetic factors to the differences measured.…”
Section: Subcortical Plasticity In the Auditory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%