2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-014-0233-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic simplification of mathematics items: effects for language minority students in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Topics range from the role of the mental model of a given task, to the teaching language, language disadvantages or linguistic modifications of tasks (e.g. Leiß et al 2010;Prediger et al 2013;Haag et al 2015). In addition to this thematic extension, there has also been a considerable methodological development.…”
Section: Research Questions In the Field Of Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topics range from the role of the mental model of a given task, to the teaching language, language disadvantages or linguistic modifications of tasks (e.g. Leiß et al 2010;Prediger et al 2013;Haag et al 2015). In addition to this thematic extension, there has also been a considerable methodological development.…”
Section: Research Questions In the Field Of Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 30 years, research in mathematics education and linguistics has contributed to unpacking the connection between mathematical thinking and language, mainly with a focus on the lexical dimension (showing the relevance of extended vocabulary; see Pimm 1987;Schleppegrell 2007;Prediger and Zindel 2017) and the discourse dimension (identifying more complex discourse practices such as explaining and arguing; see Moschkovich 2015;Erath et al 2018). In the syntactic dimension, however, academic language demands occurring in mathematical learning processes have mainly been investigated with respect to language reception: By analyzing students' comprehension processes for mathematical texts in textbooks (Bailey 2007;Österholm and Bergqvist 2013) and assessments (Abedi 2006;Haag et al 2015;Leiss et al 2017), detailed knowledge has been gathered about potential syntactic obstacles. Whereas these studies have focused on the communicative role of the academic language register, little exploration of its epistemic role has been done with respect to students' oral language production in mathematical learning processes.…”
Section: Zunehmend Elaborierter Sprachgebrauch Von Elftklässlerinnen mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the syntactic dimension of language in mathematics has mainly been studied with respect to syntactic obstacles in language reception. By analyzing students' understanding of mathematical texts in textbooks (Bailey 2007;Österholm and Bergqvist 2013) and assessments (Abedi 2006;Haag et al 2015;Leiss et al 2017), some syntactic features have repeatedly been identified as potentially difficult in mathematics-related reading (see Abedi (2006) for an extensive research overview): active vs. passive voice, length of nominals (in compound nouns or complex nominal phrases), comparatives structure, complex prepositional phrases, and sub-clauses.…”
Section: Current Research On the Syntactic Dimension Of Academic Langmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong connection between mathematics achievement and language proficiency is often investigated with respect to language biases in tests (Abedi, 2006;Haag, Heppt, Roppelt, & Stanat, 2015) and constraints in reading proficiency (Abedi & Lord, 2001;Hirsch, 2003). In these studies, language is mostly treated in its communicative role and tends to be considered as external to the core of mathematics.…”
Section: Language Gaps In Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Devmentioning
confidence: 99%