The Handbook of Language and Gender 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470756942.ch24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
44
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This topic may have reinforced the effect of feminine forms in the description. Language reform in the direction of gender-fairness was indeed a political act and originated from the feminist movement (Pauwels, 2003). Thus, novel feminine forms used in a gender context may be perceived as signaling feminism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic may have reinforced the effect of feminine forms in the description. Language reform in the direction of gender-fairness was indeed a political act and originated from the feminist movement (Pauwels, 2003). Thus, novel feminine forms used in a gender context may be perceived as signaling feminism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atkins-Sayre (2005), however, traces out the history of the successful introduction of the title Ms and reports that Ms has begun to shed its negative connotations. Holmes (2001) and Pauwels (2001bPauwels ( , 2003 find evidence of an increasing use of Ms among women, especially those who are younger and educated to tertiary level, in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA.…”
Section: Titlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looked at another way, this is an argument for recognition of the fact that polysemy exists and that one sense can become more dominant than another because of the influence of powerful ideological interests. It is precisely this that allows, for example, feminist language reform without threatening the fundamental values of linguistics (Pauwels, 2003;Mills, 2008). We can make a general observation here.…”
Section: Clear and Present Powermentioning
confidence: 99%